Pathogenesis, Therapeutic Targets, and Drug Development for Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatohepatitis (MASH/NASH)
Pathogenesis, Therapeutic Targets, and Drug Development for Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatohepatitis (MASH/NASH)
Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis is jointly driven by hepatic fat accumulation, lipotoxicity, insulin resistance, inflammation, and fibrosis. Targeting lipid metabolism, nuclear receptors, incretin pathways, and FGF signaling has become a major direction in drug development.
Keywords: MASH; NASH; MASLD; lipotoxicity; insulin resistance; hepatic fibrosis; THR-β; FXR; GLP-1R; FGF21; drug development
1 Disease Spectrum and Pathological Characteristics of MASH/NASH
1.1 Definitions of MASLD and MASH
Fatty liver diseases are now classified under the framework of steatotic liver disease (SLD). Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) refers to hepatic steatosis accompanied by at least one cardiometabolic risk factor. When hepatocellular ballooning and lobular inflammation develop on the basis of steatosis, the condition can be diagnosed as metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH). MASH is the updated term for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), and the two terms generally refer to the same pathological entity in previous research and drug-development programs.
1.2 Progression From Simple Steatosis to Steatohepatitis
MASLD may present as relatively stable simple hepatic steatosis or progress to MASH accompanied by inflammation and hepatocellular injury. Disease progression is not determined solely by intrahepatic triglyceride content but is jointly influenced by free fatty acid influx, de novo lipogenesis, fatty acid oxidation, lipoprotein export, accumulation of lipotoxic molecules, and the host genetic background.
1.3 Histopathological Characteristics of MASH
The main histological features of MASH include macrovesicular hepatic steatosis, lobular inflammation, and hepatocellular ballooning, with variable degrees of fibrosis. Hepatocellular ballooning reflects cytoskeletal disruption, organelle stress, and metabolic dysfunction, whereas lobular inflammation mainly involves recruitment of Kupffer cells, monocytes, and other immune cells.
1.4 Staging of Hepatic Fibrosis
MASH-associated fibrosis generally begins in the centrilobular and perisinusoidal regions and may gradually progress to portal fibrosis, bridging fibrosis, and cirrhosis. F0 indicates no fibrosis, F1 mild fibrosis, F2 moderate fibrosis, F3 bridging fibrosis, and F4 cirrhosis. The degree of fibrosis is more strongly associated with the risk of adverse liver-related outcomes than inflammation or steatosis alone.
1.5 Disease Heterogeneity
MASH can occur in patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes but can also develop in individuals of normal body weight who have visceral fat accumulation, sarcopenia, or genetic susceptibility. Genetic variants in PNPLA3, TM6SF2, MBOAT7, GCKR, and other genes can affect lipid-droplet remodeling, lipoprotein export, and intrahepatic lipid composition, resulting in substantially different rates of disease progression under similar metabolic conditions.
1.6 Extrahepatic Complications
In addition to risks of cirrhosis, hepatic decompensation, and hepatocellular carcinoma, patients with MASH frequently have cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and obstructive sleep apnea. Treatment should evaluate hepatic pathology, body weight, blood glucose, blood lipids, and cardiovascular risk rather than focusing only on reducing hepatic fat content.
Table 1 Stages of MASH Progression and Major Pathological Characteristics
Disease Stage | Major Pathological Characteristics | Major Evaluation Indicators | Major Risks |
Simple steatosis | Increased lipid droplets in hepatocytes without marked ballooning or inflammation | Hepatic fat content and liver enzymes | May remain stable for a prolonged period or progress |
Early MASH | Steatosis, lobular inflammation, and ballooning | NAS and markers of inflammation and cellular injury | Progression toward fibrosis |
F1 fibrosis | Mild perisinusoidal or portal fibrosis | Histology and elastography | Still highly reversible |
F2 fibrosis | Coexisting perisinusoidal and portal fibrosis | Histology, ELF, and MRE | Increased risk of liver-related outcomes |
F3 fibrosis | Bridging fibrosis | Histology, MRE, and serum fibrosis markers | High risk of progression to cirrhosis |
F4 fibrosis | Cirrhosis and nodule formation | Portal hypertension, liver function, and imaging | Decompensation, hepatocellular carcinoma, and death |
2 Mechanisms of Hepatic Lipid Accumulation and Lipotoxic Injury
2.1 Major Sources of Hepatic Fatty Acids
Hepatic fatty acids are mainly derived from free fatty acids released by adipose tissue, hepatic de novo lipogenesis, and dietary lipids. Insulin resistance weakens the inhibitory effect of insulin on adipose-tissue lipolysis, allowing large quantities of free fatty acids to enter the liver. High glucose and fructose intake can enhance hepatic de novo lipogenesis through ChREBP and SREBP-1c.
2.2 Abnormal De Novo Lipogenesis
Acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACC) converts acetyl-CoA into malonyl-CoA, fatty acid synthase (FASN) further synthesizes long-chain fatty acids, and stearoyl-CoA desaturase 1 (SCD1) generates monounsaturated fatty acids. Sustained activation of these enzymes increases the hepatic fatty acid supply. Malonyl-CoA also inhibits CPT1A-mediated fatty acid entry into mitochondria, creating a metabolic state characterized by increased synthesis and restricted oxidation.
2.3 Dual Effects of Triglyceride Storage
Hepatocytes can esterify fatty acids into triglycerides through DGAT1 and DGAT2 and store them in lipid droplets. Moderate triglyceride synthesis can sequester free fatty acids and reduce immediate toxicity. However, sustained expansion of lipid droplets causes hepatic steatosis and provides a continuing substrate source for lipid peroxidation and formation of lipotoxic molecules.

Figure 1. Fatty acid synthesis, β-oxidation, and triglyceride storage pathways in hepatocytes
2.4 Lipotoxic Lipid Molecules
Diacylglycerols, ceramides, free cholesterol, lysophospholipids, and oxidized lipids are more cytotoxic than neutral triglycerides. Diacylglycerols can activate PKCε and inhibit hepatic insulin signaling, ceramides can disrupt AKT and mitochondrial function, and free cholesterol can destabilize mitochondrial membranes, the endoplasmic reticulum, and lysosomes.
2.5 Mitochondrial Overload and Oxidative Stress
In the early stages of hepatic fat accumulation, mitochondrial β-oxidation may increase compensatorily. Long-term fatty acid overload, however, causes pressure on the electron transport chain, reactive oxygen species generation, and reduced ATP-synthesis efficiency. Fatty acid oxidation in peroxisomes and microsomes also increases reactive oxygen species, further aggravating lipid peroxidation, protein oxidation, and mitochondrial DNA damage.
2.6 Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and the Unfolded Protein Response
Saturated fatty acids, cholesterol, and oxidative stress can disrupt the endoplasmic reticulum membrane environment and cause accumulation of misfolded proteins. The unfolded protein response mediated by PERK, IRE1α, and ATF6 is adaptive in the early stage, but persistent activation induces CHOP, JNK, and inflammatory signaling, promoting hepatocyte apoptosis and insulin resistance.
2.7 Lipophagy and Lysosomal Dysfunction
Lipid droplets can be delivered to lysosomes through lipophagy and degraded into fatty acids. In MASH, impaired autophagosome formation, lysosomal acidification, or lipid-droplet recognition reduces lipid-clearance capacity. Lysosomal cholesterol accumulation and increased membrane permeability can also promote inflammasome activation and cell death.
3 Insulin Resistance, Inflammatory Responses, and Progression of Hepatic Fibrosis
3.1 Hepatic and Peripheral Insulin Resistance
Skeletal muscle insulin resistance reduces glucose uptake and causes more glucose to reach the liver. Adipose-tissue insulin resistance enhances lipolysis and causes continuous free fatty acid influx into the liver. Hepatic insulin resistance prevents adequate suppression of gluconeogenesis. At the same time, lipogenic pathways may remain selectively responsive to hyperinsulinemia, resulting in simultaneous enhancement of gluconeogenesis and lipid synthesis.
3.2 Kupffer Cells and Monocyte Recruitment
Lipotoxic hepatocytes release damage-associated molecules such as ATP, mitochondrial DNA, HMGB1, and oxidized lipids, activating Kupffer cells and liver sinusoidal endothelial cells. Chemokines such as CCL2 further recruit CCR2-positive monocytes into the liver, creating an inflammatory environment that continuously produces TNF-α, IL-1β, and TGF-β.
Gut-derived lipopolysaccharide, fatty acids, and damage-associated molecules can activate TLR4 and downstream NF-κB signaling. Cholesterol crystals, mitochondrial reactive oxygen species, and extracellular ATP can also promote assembly of the NLRP3 inflammasome, resulting in Caspase-1 activation and maturation of IL-1β and IL-18, thereby amplifying hepatocellular injury and immune-cell recruitment.
3.4 Modes of Hepatocyte Death
Hepatocytes in MASH can undergo apoptosis, necroptosis, pyroptosis, and ferroptosis. Different forms of cell death release distinct cellular contents and lipid mediators, but all can promote macrophage activation and hepatic stellate cell recruitment. When iron loading, glutathione depletion, and peroxidation of polyunsaturated lipids increase, ferroptosis may become an important mechanism of injury.
3.5 Activation of Hepatic Stellate Cells
After exposure to TGF-β, PDGF, reactive oxygen species, apoptotic bodies, and increased matrix stiffness, quiescent hepatic stellate cells can transform into myofibroblast-like cells expressing α-smooth muscle actin. Activated hepatic stellate cells produce type I and type III collagen, fibronectin, TIMP1, and other matrix components and are the principal effector cells responsible for MASH-associated fibrosis.
3.6 TGF-β and PDGF Signaling
TGF-β promotes collagen transcription and suppresses matrix degradation through TGFBR1/2 and SMAD2/3 and is a central fibrotic signal. PDGF mainly promotes hepatic stellate cell proliferation, migration, and survival. These pathways cooperate with integrins, YAP/TAZ, LOXL2, and mechanical stress signaling, causing hepatic tissue to gradually develop a stable fibrotic network that is difficult to degrade.
3.7 Dysregulation of the Gut-Liver Axis
Disruption of the intestinal barrier, changes in microbiota composition, and abnormal bile acid metabolism can increase entry of microbial products into the portal circulation. Changes in lipopolysaccharide, ethanol, short-chain fatty acids, and secondary bile acids can affect hepatic inflammation, FXR signaling, and insulin sensitivity. However, microbiota features vary substantially among patients, and no single microbiota pattern is applicable to all patients with MASH.
4 Therapeutic Targets Related to Lipid Synthesis and Oxidative Metabolism
4.1 ACC Inhibition
Inhibition of ACC1 reduces de novo lipogenesis, whereas inhibition of ACC2 decreases malonyl-CoA-mediated suppression of CPT1A and promotes fatty acid oxidation. ACC inhibition usually reduces hepatic fat rapidly, but decreased hepatic fatty acid synthesis can trigger SREBP1 compensation and increased very-low-density lipoprotein export, resulting in elevated serum triglycerides.
4.2 FASN Inhibition
FASN catalyzes the terminal synthetic step in de novo lipogenesis. FASN inhibition reduces palmitate production and decreases diacylglycerols, ceramides, and other lipotoxic lipids. Compared with ACC inhibition, FASN inhibition has a different effect on malonyl-CoA levels and may reduce some compensatory hypertriglyceridemia. Skin, neurological, and systemic effects associated with lipid synthesis still require monitoring.
4.3 Modulation of SCD1
SCD1 catalyzes the conversion of saturated fatty acids into monounsaturated fatty acids and promotes triglyceride synthesis. SCD1 inhibition can reduce lipogenesis but may also increase saturated fatty acid-induced endoplasmic reticulum stress. Development of this target requires balancing reduced lipid-droplet formation against avoidance of saturated fatty acid toxicity.
4.4 DGAT2 Inhibition
DGAT2 mainly participates in triglyceride synthesis in hepatocytes and is tightly coupled to de novo lipogenesis. DGAT2 inhibition can reduce hepatic fat and lipoprotein output. However, excessive restriction of triglyceride storage may redirect free fatty acids toward ceramide, diacylglycerol, or other lipotoxic pathways, requiring lipidomic evaluation.
4.5 AMPK and Mitochondrial Metabolism
AMPK can inhibit ACC and SREBP-1c while promoting fatty acid oxidation, autophagy, and mitochondrial homeostasis. Activating AMPK or increasing mitochondrial oxidative capacity has the potential to reduce hepatic fat. However, increasing fatty acid oxidation without simultaneously improving electron transport chain function may aggravate oxidative stress.
4.6 PPAR-Mediated Metabolic Reprogramming
PPARα promotes fatty acid oxidation and lipoprotein metabolism, PPARδ participates in energy expenditure and insulin sensitivity, and PPARγ regulates adipose-tissue differentiation and safe lipid storage. Pan-PPAR or dual-PPAR modulation can simultaneously improve lipid metabolism, inflammation, and fibrosis but may cause weight gain, fluid retention, anemia, or other receptor subtype-related adverse effects.
5 Regulation of Bile Acid, Thyroid Hormone, and Nuclear Receptor Signaling
5.1 Bile Acids and FXR Signaling
Bile acids participate not only in lipid digestion but also serve as endogenous ligands for the farnesoid X receptor (FXR). Hepatic FXR activation suppresses bile acid synthesis and lipogenesis, whereas intestinal FXR induces FGF19 secretion and inhibits CYP7A1 through hepatic FGFR4/β-Klotho signaling. FXR agonists can improve metabolic and fibrotic signaling, but pruritus, increased low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and disruption of bile acid homeostasis can limit the use of some agents.
5.2 Thyroid Hormone Receptor Beta
Thyroid hormone receptor beta (THR-β) is predominantly expressed in the liver and can promote fatty acid oxidation, mitochondrial biogenesis, and cholesterol metabolism while reducing hepatic fat accumulation. Selective THR-β agonists are designed to preserve hepatic metabolic effects while reducing THR-α-mediated effects on heart rate, bone, and myocardium.
5.3 Liver Selectivity of Resmetirom
Resmetirom is a liver-targeted selective THR-β agonist that enhances hepatic fatty acid oxidation and improves the atherogenic lipid profile. Its therapeutic value extends beyond reduction of hepatic fat because some patients can achieve resolution of steatohepatitis or improvement of fibrosis.
5.4 Cooperation Among PPAR Nuclear Receptors
PPARα, PPARδ, and PPARγ respectively regulate hepatic fatty acid oxidation, muscular energy utilization, adipose-tissue lipid storage, and anti-inflammatory responses. Pan-PPAR agonists can intervene in MASH through the liver, adipose tissue, and immune cells, but both efficacy and adverse effects depend on the relative degree of activation of the different receptor subtypes.
5.5 Selectivity Requirements for Nuclear Receptor Targeting
Nuclear receptors are broadly involved in normal metabolic homeostasis, and strong systemic activation may cause effects unrelated to the target organ. Drug development must simultaneously optimize receptor-subtype selectivity, hepatic exposure, tissue distribution, and the downstream gene-expression profile rather than relying solely on in vitro receptor-activation potency to define the therapeutic window.
6 Metabolic Intervention Mediated by GLP-1R, FGF19, and FGF21
6.1 GLP-1R Agonists
GLP-1R agonists reduce appetite, delay gastric emptying, promote glucose-dependent insulin secretion, and reduce body weight, thereby decreasing adipose-tissue lipolysis and hepatic fatty acid influx. Whether hepatocytes express sufficient functional GLP-1R to mediate direct pharmacological effects remains controversial. Their effects in MASH should therefore mainly be interpreted in terms of weight loss, improved insulin sensitivity, and reduced systemic metabolic burden.
6.2 Dual and Multiple Incretin-Receptor Agonism
GIPR/GLP-1R dual agonists and GLP-1R/GIPR/GCGR multi-receptor agonists can produce stronger weight loss through appetite suppression, adipose-tissue metabolic regulation, and increased energy expenditure. GCGR activation may also increase hepatic fatty acid oxidation and energy expenditure but has the potential to elevate blood glucose and must be balanced by GLP-1R and GIPR signaling.
6.3 FGF19 Signaling
FGF19 is secreted by ileal cells after FXR activation and acts on the liver through FGFR4 and β-Klotho to suppress bile acid synthesis and regulate glucose and lipid metabolism. Engineered FGF19 analogs can reduce hepatic fat and improve inflammation and fibrosis but must minimize the risk of sustained wild-type FGF19-mediated activation of FGFR4-associated proliferative signaling.
6.4 FGF21 Signaling
FGF21 acts primarily through FGFR1c/β-Klotho in adipose tissue and central metabolic networks, improving insulin sensitivity, promoting fatty acid utilization, and improving blood lipids. Long-acting FGF21 analogs can simultaneously reduce hepatic fat, triglycerides, and certain fibrosis indicators and are an important direction in MASH drug development.
6.5 Pegozafermin and Efruxifermin
Pegozafermin and Efruxifermin are both long-acting FGF21 analogs but differ in molecular engineering strategy, receptor activity, and pharmacokinetics. Pegozafermin has shown histological improvement in studies of noncirrhotic patients with F2-F3 fibrosis. Efruxifermin is also being continuously evaluated across different fibrosis stages. Disease stage, treatment duration, and baseline metabolic status can all affect actual efficacy.
6.6 Combined Intervention With Metabolic Factors
GLP-1R agonists mainly reduce energy intake and body weight, FGF21 analogs more strongly affect lipid handling, insulin sensitivity, and adipose-tissue signaling, and THR-β agonists directly enhance hepatic lipid metabolism. These mechanisms are complementary, but combination treatment requires monitoring of gastrointestinal reactions, the magnitude of weight loss, gallbladder disease, and pharmacokinetic changes.
7 Mechanisms and Clinical Translation of Approved and Investigational MASH/NASH Therapies
7.1 Resmetirom
Resmetirom selectively activates hepatic THR-β, promotes fatty acid oxidation, and improves cholesterol and lipoprotein metabolism. It can increase the proportions of patients achieving steatohepatitis resolution and fibrosis improvement and is used in noncirrhotic adults with MASH and moderate-to-advanced fibrosis.
7.2 Semaglutide
Semaglutide acts through GLP-1R signaling to reduce body weight and improve insulin resistance and cardiometabolic risk factors. It can increase the proportion of patients achieving MASH resolution and fibrosis improvement, particularly in those with obesity, type 2 diabetes, or multiple cardiometabolic risk factors.
7.3 Lanifibranor
Lanifibranor is a pan-PPAR agonist that simultaneously regulates fatty acid oxidation, adipose-tissue function, inflammation, and hepatic stellate cell activation. It has the potential to improve disease activity, steatohepatitis, and fibrosis, but adverse effects such as weight gain, edema, and anemia require monitoring.
7.4 FGF21 Analogs
FGF21 analogs can simultaneously improve hepatic fat, insulin sensitivity, triglycerides, and certain fibrosis indicators. Pegozafermin and Efruxifermin represent major development directions in this class. However, different fibrosis stages, treatment durations, and histological endpoints can produce different results, and rapid reductions in hepatic fat cannot be directly equated with improved long-term clinical outcomes.
7.5 FGF19 Analogs and FXR Agonists
Engineered FGF19 analogs and FXR agonists can suppress bile acid synthesis, reduce hepatic fat, and regulate fibrosis. Major development challenges include pruritus, increased low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, gallbladder-related reactions, and long-term FGFR4 proliferative signaling. Drug structure and receptor bias are therefore critical.
7.6 FASN, ACC, and DGAT2 Inhibitors
FASN inhibitors directly reduce de novo fatty acid synthesis, ACC inhibitors both reduce lipogenesis and promote oxidation, and DGAT2 inhibitors limit triglyceride synthesis. These agents generally reduce MRI-PDFF relatively rapidly. Whether they can sustainably improve ballooning and fibrosis depends on lipotoxic lipid shunting, compensatory changes in blood lipids, and long-term safety.
7.7 Anti-Inflammatory and Antifibrotic Drugs
Targets such as CCR2/CCR5, ASK1, TGF-β, LOXL2, and integrins can respectively interfere with inflammatory-cell recruitment, stress kinases, hepatic stellate cell activation, and matrix cross-linking. Some single-target agents failed to reproduce early results in later-stage studies, indicating that MASH fibrosis is maintained by multiple parallel pathways and that blocking a single inflammatory or matrix node may be insufficient to reverse disease.
Table 2 Major MASH Drug Directions and Their Characteristics
Drug or Class | Major Target | Major Effects | Clinical Positioning or Development Status |
Resmetirom | THR-β | Enhances hepatic fatty acid oxidation and improves blood lipids | Used for noncirrhotic F2-F3 MASH |
Semaglutide | GLP-1R | Promotes weight loss and improves insulin resistance and hepatic histology | Used for MASH with moderate-to-advanced fibrosis |
Lanifibranor | PPARα/δ/γ | Regulates lipid metabolism, inflammation, and fibrosis | Late-stage clinical development |
Pegozafermin | FGF21 pathway | Improves hepatic fat, blood lipids, and fibrosis | Late-stage clinical development |
Efruxifermin | FGF21 pathway | Improves insulin sensitivity and hepatic metabolism | Late-stage clinical development |
FGF19 analogs | FGFR4/β-Klotho | Suppress bile acid synthesis and improve metabolism | Clinical development |
FXR agonists | FXR | Regulate bile acids, lipids, and fibrosis | Efficacy and tolerability remain under evaluation |
FASN inhibitors | FASN | Reduce de novo lipogenesis and lipotoxic lipids | Clinical development |
ACC inhibitors | ACC1/ACC2 | Reduce lipogenesis and promote fatty acid oxidation | Require control of triglyceride elevation |
DGAT2 inhibitors | DGAT2 | Reduce hepatic triglyceride synthesis | Clinical development |
Anti-inflammatory and antifibrotic drugs | CCR2/5, TGF-β, LOXL2, and others | Suppress immune recruitment and matrix deposition | Most require combination with metabolic intervention |
8 Efficacy Evaluation, Biomarkers, and Combination-Treatment Strategies
8.1 Histological Evaluation of the Liver
Liver biopsy remains an important method for evaluating steatosis, ballooning, lobular inflammation, and fibrosis. Drug studies frequently use “MASH resolution without worsening of fibrosis” or “improvement of fibrosis by at least one stage without worsening of MASH” as histological endpoints. However, biopsy represents only a local tissue region and is affected by sampling error and inter-reader variability.
8.2 MRI-PDFF and Quantification of Hepatic Fat
Magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) provides noninvasive quantitative evaluation of whole-liver fat content and is suitable for early pharmacodynamic assessment and dose selection. A marked reduction in MRI-PDFF generally indicates improved lipid metabolism but cannot independently demonstrate reversal of hepatocellular ballooning, inflammation, or fibrosis.
8.3 Evaluation of Liver Stiffness
Transient elastography and magnetic resonance elastography can evaluate liver stiffness and support fibrosis-risk stratification. Inflammation, cholestasis, and hepatic congestion can also increase liver stiffness. A reduction in stiffness after treatment should therefore be interpreted together with liver enzymes, inflammatory status, and serum fibrosis markers.
8.4 Serum Biomarkers
ALT, AST, and GGT reflect hepatocellular injury but lack specificity for fibrosis. FIB-4, the NAFLD fibrosis score, ELF, Pro-C3, CK-18, TIMP1, hyaluronic acid, and other markers can evaluate cell death, matrix formation, and fibrosis risk from different perspectives. Combined use is generally more informative than any single marker.
8.5 Metabolic and Cardiovascular Indicators
Body weight, waist circumference, HbA1c, insulin resistance, triglycerides, LDL-C, HDL-C, and blood pressure should be included in efficacy evaluation. Some drugs may improve hepatic pathology while increasing LDL-C or body weight, whereas others may produce substantial weight loss without completely resolving fibrosis. Net clinical benefit therefore requires integrated assessment.
8.6 Pharmacodynamic Stratification and Companion Biomarkers
Patients with high de novo lipogenesis may be more suitable for ACC or FASN inhibition, patients with marked obesity and insulin resistance may derive greater benefit from incretin-based therapies, and patients with elevated LDL-C and hepatic fat may be candidates for THR-β targeting. FGF21, bile acid profiles, lipidomics, and genetic variants may further support stratification but still require standardized validation.
8.7 Combination-Treatment Strategies
Combination treatment can use weight-loss or insulin-sensitizing agents as a metabolic foundation and add hepatic lipid-metabolism or antifibrotic drugs. For example, GLP-1R agonists can reduce fatty acid influx, THR-β or FGF21 agents can increase lipid clearance, and antifibrotic drugs can target residual matrix deposition. Combination design should avoid redundant mechanisms and additive adverse effects.
8.8 Long-Term Clinical Outcomes
Histological improvement is a surrogate endpoint. Long-term evaluation should also assess progression to cirrhosis, portal hypertension, hepatic decompensation, liver transplantation, hepatocellular carcinoma, cardiovascular events, and death. Treatment must demonstrate that histological benefit translates into improved long-term clinical outcomes.
9 Products
9.1 FGF19, FGF21, β-Klotho, and FGFR Signaling Research Products
Catalog # | Product Name | Grade & Purity | Main Application |
Recombinant Human FGF19 Protein | Animal Free, carrier-free, bioactive, ActiBioPure™, azide-free, His Tag, ≥98% (SDS-PAGE) | Studies of FGF19-FGFR4/β-Klotho signaling, bile acid metabolism, and hepatic lipid regulation | |
Mouse Fibroblast Growth Factor 19(FGF19) ELISA Kit | BioReagent | Quantitative detection of FGF15 in mouse MASH models for evaluation of the orthologous FGF15/FGF19 signaling axis | |
Mouse Fibroblast Growth Factor 21 (FGF21) ELISA Kit | BioReagent | Evaluation of the FGF21 metabolic response in mouse MASH models | |
RG7992 (anti-Klotho Beta) | Animal Free, carrier-free, recombinant, ExactAb™, low endotoxin, azide-free, validated, ≥95% (SDS-PAGE & SEC-HPLC), see COA | β-Klotho-targeted binding and FGF19/FGF21 receptor-complex research | |
Recombinant Mouse Klotho beta Protein | Animal Free, carrier-free, bioactive, ActiBioPure™, high-performance, His Tag, ≥95% (SDS-PAGE), expressed in CHO, see COA | FGF19 and FGF21 coreceptor binding and mouse-model research | |
Human Klotho Protein β (KLβ) ELISA Kit | BioReagent | Quantitative detection of β-Klotho in human samples | |
PD173074 | Moligand™, ≥99% | Validation of the role of FGFR1 in FGF21 metabolic signaling | |
Recombinant Human FGFR1 Protein | Animal Free, carrier-free, bioactive, ActiBioPure™, azide-free, high-performance, His Tag, Fc-tagged, ≥95% (SDS-PAGE) | FGF21 receptor binding, ligand screening, and pharmacological research | |
BLU-9931 | Moligand™, ≥97% | Validation of FGF19-FGFR4 signaling in bile acid and hepatic metabolic regulation | |
Recombinant FGFR4 Antibody | Recombinant, ExactAb™, validated, see COA | Detection of FGFR4 expression and receptor-signaling changes | |
Recombinant Human FGFR4 Protein | Animal Free, carrier-free, bioactive, ActiBioPure™, high-performance, His Tag, PBS Only, ≥95% (SDS-PAGE) | FGF19 receptor binding and evaluation of FGFR4 inhibitors | |
Human Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 4 (FGFR4) ELISA Kit | BioReagent | Quantitative detection of FGFR4 in human samples |
9.2 GLP-1R and FXR Metabolic Signaling Research Products
Catalog # | Product Name | Grade & Purity | Main Application |
Centocor patent anti-GLP-1R (anti-GLP1R) | Animal Free, carrier-free, recombinant, ExactAb™, low endotoxin, azide-free, validated, ≥95% (SDS-PAGE & SEC-HPLC), see COA | GLP-1R binding, receptor-expression, and antibody-function studies | |
GLP-1 (7-37) | ≥98% | GLP-1R activation and evaluation of cellular signaling and metabolic effects | |
GLP-1R/GIPR agonist-1 | — | Research on GLP-1R/GIPR dual activation and metabolic synergy | |
Recombinant Human GLP-1R Protein | Animal Free, carrier-free, bioactive, ActiBioPure™, His Tag, ≥95% (SDS-PAGE) | GLP-1R ligand binding, antibody screening, and receptor-pharmacology research | |
Fexaramine | Moligand™, ≥97% (HPLC) | FXR activation and studies of the gut-liver axis, bile acids, and lipid metabolism | |
GW4064 | Moligand™, ≥98% | FXR activation, CYP7A1 regulation, and hepatic lipid-metabolism research | |
DY 268 | ≥98% (HPLC) | FXR blockade and validation of receptor dependence in bile acid and metabolic effects | |
Human Farnesoid X Receptor (FXR) ELISA Kit | BioReagent | Quantitative detection of FXR in human samples |
9.3 Lipid Synthesis and Fatty Acid Oxidation Research Products
Catalog # | Product Name | Grade & Purity | Main Application |
Recombinant Human SREBP1 Protein | Carrier-free, His Tag, ≥90% (SDS-PAGE), expressed in E. coli, see COA | SREBP1 transcriptional regulation and de novo lipogenesis research | |
Fasnall | ≥99% | FASN inhibition and evaluation of de novo lipogenesis and lipotoxicity | |
GSK 2194069 | Moligand™, ≥97% | Human FASN inhibition and studies of hepatocellular fatty acid synthesis | |
Human Fatty Acid Synthase (FASN) ELISA Kit | BioReagent | Quantitative detection of FASN in human samples | |
CAY 10566 | ≥99% | Inhibition of fatty acid desaturation and evaluation of lipid-droplet formation and lipotoxicity | |
SCD1 Inhibitor (DMSO solution) | ≥99% | Cell-based SCD1 inhibition and dose-response research | |
DGAT2-IN-3 | — | DGAT2 inhibition and studies of triglyceride synthesis and lipid shunting | |
JNJ DGAT2-A | ≥98% | Evaluation of DGAT2 inhibition on hepatic fat and lipid-droplet formation | |
PF 06424439 | ≥98% (HPLC) | DGAT2 target validation and hepatocellular lipid-metabolism research | |
Recombinant Human CPT1A Protein | ≥90% (SDS-PAGE) | CPT1A-mediated mitochondrial fatty acid transport and β-oxidation research |
9.4 Products for Research on TGF-β-Mediated Hepatic Stellate Cell Activation and Fibrosis
Catalog # | Product Name | Grade & Purity | Main Application |
GW788388 | ≥98% | TGF-βRI inhibition and evaluation of hepatic stellate cell activation and collagen expression | |
IN 1130 | ≥98% (HPLC) | TGF-β/SMAD signaling and hepatic fibrosis-mechanism research | |
LY2157299 | Moligand™, ≥99% | TGF-β receptor kinase and antifibrotic research | |
RepSox | ≥98% | TGF-βRI blockade and evaluation of SMAD2/3 activation | |
SD-208 | Moligand™, ≥98% | TGF-βRI inhibition and collagen-deposition research | |
Human Transforming Growth Factor Beta 1 (TGF-β1) ELISA Kit | BioReagent | Quantitative detection of TGF-β1 in human samples | |
Mouse Transforming Growth Factor β1(TGF-β1) ELISA Kit | BioReagent | Evaluation of TGF-β1 in mouse MASH fibrosis models |
9.5 Products for Research on PDGF-Mediated Hepatic Stellate Cell Proliferation and Migration
Catalog # | Product Name | Grade & Purity | Main Application |
Recombinant Human PDGF AA Protein | Carrier-free, bioactive, ActiBioPure™, high-performance, ≥95% (SDS-PAGE), see COA | PDGFRA signaling and hepatic stellate cell proliferation studies | |
Recombinant Human PDGF-BB Protein | Carrier-free, bioactive, ActiBioPure™, high-performance, His Tag, ≥95% (SDS-PAGE), see COA | Induction of hepatic stellate cell proliferation, migration, and fibrotic phenotypes | |
Recombinant Human PDGF-AB Protein | Carrier-free, bioactive, ActiBioPure™, high-performance, ≥90% (SDS-PAGE), see COA | PDGFRA/PDGFRB combined signaling and cellular-function research | |
Recombinant Human PDGF R alpha Protein | Animal Free, carrier-free, bioactive, ActiBioPure™, His Tag, PBS Only, ≥95% (SDS-PAGE) | PDGFRA ligand binding and inhibitor evaluation | |
Recombinant Human PDGF R beta Protein | Animal Free, carrier-free, His Tag, PBS Only, ≥95% (SDS-PAGE) | PDGFRB binding and hepatic stellate cell-signaling research | |
Recombinant PDGFR beta Antibody | Recombinant, ExactAb™, validated, 0.3 mg/mL | Detection of PDGFRB in activated hepatic stellate cells | |
CP-673451 | Moligand™, ≥98% | PDGFR inhibition and evaluation of hepatic stellate cell proliferation and migration | |
Human Platelet Derived Growth Factor BB (PDGF-BB) ELISA Kit | BioReagent | Quantitative detection of PDGF-BB in human samples |
MASH is jointly driven by dysregulated lipid metabolism, insulin resistance, inflammation, and hepatic fibrosis. THR-β, GLP-1R, FGF21, and lipid-synthesis pathways are major therapeutic directions. Drug development must balance histological improvement in the liver, metabolic benefit, and long-term safety.
For more related articles, please see below:
[1] The Fibroblast Development Factor (FGF) Family
[2] Ligand Systems, Receptor Activation, and Biological Effects of the FGF Pathway
