From “High Yield” to “Configuration Retention”: Activation-Stage Risks, Route Differences, and Selection Principles for Coupling Systems

1. Why discussions of coupling systems today cannot focus only on “whether the yield is high”

In amide and peptide synthesis, whether a bond can be formed is certainly important. However, for amino acids, peptide fragments, and chiral carboxylic acid substrates containing an α-stereogenic center, another issue often plays an equally decisive role in determining the quality of the outcome: whether the configuration can be preserved as much as possible during bond formation. Recent coupling methodologies are worth re-examining precisely because the evaluation criteria themselves are changing. In addition to yield, rate, and operational convenience, researchers are increasingly concerned with whether the activation stage is controllable, whether it readily induces racemization/epimerization, and whether the method can be extended to more demanding peptide-chemistry tasks. The 2024 review on racemization-free coupling reagents reorganized progress over the past decade from exactly this perspective.

For the synthesis of chiral amides and peptides, loss of configuration is not a secondary issue. Once racemization or epimerization occurs in a key intermediate, the consequences often extend far beyond stereochemical purity itself, affecting biological activity evaluation, downstream purification and separation, the reliability of fragment elongation, and the feasibility of scale-up. This is especially true in peptide fragment coupling, difficult couplings, head-to-tail cyclization, and multistep elongation, where a stereochemical deviation introduced in an earlier step often persists into subsequent steps and becomes even more evident as the synthesis grows more complex.

Core Questions at a Glance

Core Question	Why It Matters	What This Article Focuses On
Why can we no longer look only at “whether the yield is high”?	For chiral substrates, configuration retention directly affects product authenticity, purification burden, and the reliability of downstream steps.	The evaluation standard for coupling systems is expanding from “high reactivity” to “controllable activation + configuration retention.”
Where does the risk of racemization/epimerization mainly arise?	The main risk often does not lie in the amine attack step, but in the period after carboxylic acid activation and before successful bond formation.	The type of activated intermediate, its lifetime, and its tendency to enter side pathways.
What are recent low-racemization systems actually trying to solve?	The goal is not simply to pursue “stronger reagents,” but to reduce problems caused by high-risk intermediates through different activation logics.	Active vinyl ester strategies, Oxyma-based routes, acyl imidazolium pathways, acyl thiocyanate pathways, and pyridinium activation routes.

2. Why the risk of racemization/epimerization is often exposed during the “activation stage”

For many amino acids, peptide fragments, and other chiral substrates bearing stereogenic centers, the real danger window is often not the moment when the amine completes nucleophilic attack to form the bond, but rather the period after the carboxylic acid has already been activated and before the amide bond has been formed smoothly. If the activated intermediate is too reactive, survives for too long, or readily diverts into side pathways such as oxazolone-type intermediates, the stereogenic center is more likely to be exposed to the risk of configurational loss. In peptide coupling, such configurational loss is often more accurately described as epimerization. Reviews on peptide-synthesis side reactions have likewise pointed out that for amino acids and peptide couplings prone to epimerization, the carboxylic acid activation stage and its associated side pathways are among the most critical points to control.

2.1 From activation to racemization: a risk chain worth watching

Stage	Possible Intermediate or Side Pathway	Main Problem
Carboxylic acid is activated	Overly reactive activated intermediates with relatively long lifetimes	Longer exposure of the stereogenic center and a wider window for side reactions
Activated intermediate is not trapped in time	Greater tendency to enter side pathways such as oxazolone-type intermediates	Increased likelihood of epimerization or other forms of configurational loss
Activation process becomes uncontrolled	Formation of deactivated byproducts	Reduced effective bond-forming efficiency and greater purification burden
Strong base or mismatched conditions are present	Enolization or other deprotonation pathways	Further increases the risk of configurational loss

Therefore, when evaluating anti-racemization coupling systems today, the key is not simply whether a system is “more reactive,” but how it reduces high-risk activated intermediates or shortens the time those intermediates remain in the system. This is precisely where the long-standing value of Oxyma [ethyl 2-cyano-2-(hydroxyimino)acetate] lies. Its role is not to discard the carbodiimide coupling framework altogether, but to redirect the activation process toward a more controllable pathway within an existing workflow through the use of an additive. A landmark 2009 paper showed that Oxyma has strong anti-racemization capability and can serve as a lower-explosion-risk alternative to benzotriazole-based additives such as 1-hydroxybenzotriazole (HOBt) and 1-hydroxy-7-azabenzotriazole (HOAt).

3. Several representative low-racemization activation routes and how they differ

Below, several representative routes are selected that most clearly illustrate differences in activation logic: ynamide- and allenone-based routes centered on active vinyl ester-type intermediates; Oxyma-based upgraded carbodiimide routes; the TCFH–NMI route centered on acyl imidazolium intermediates; the NDTP route proceeding through acyl thiocyanate intermediates; and the pyridinium activation route, which was used relatively early in peptide synthesis.

3.1 Core mechanisms, reported scope of application, and practical emphasis of several representative low-racemization activation routes

Activation Route	Representative System	Core Intermediate or Mechanism	Reported Scope of Application	Best Suited to Which Experimental Question
Active vinyl ester-type intermediate route	Ynamide	α-Acyloxyenamide	Applied to simple amides, dipeptides, and peptide fragment couplings; later reviews further connected this route with greener developments in peptide synthesis	Want to understand how intermediate design can be used to preserve configuration
Active vinyl ester-type intermediate route	Allenone	α-Carbonyl vinyl ester	Applied to simple amides, dipeptides, peptide fragment couplings, solid-phase peptide synthesis (SPPS), and the synthesis of complex target molecules	Want to compare how far active vinyl ester routes have advanced in more complex peptide tasks
Upgraded carbodiimide-assisted route	Oxyma / Oxyma-derived systems	Improved carbodiimide activation pathway	Widely used in peptide coupling; emphasizes anti-racemization capability and a lower-explosion-risk replacement strategy	Want to optimize an existing carbodiimide workflow rather than replace the entire route
Acyl imidazolium route	TCFH–NMI	Acyl imidazolium	Focused on difficult amide bond formation; particularly effective for sterically hindered carboxylic acids and poorly nucleophilic amines, while preserving adjacent stereocenters in many examples	The substrate itself is difficult to couple, and a stronger yet still as controllable as possible activation mode is needed
Acyl thiocyanate route	NDTP	Acyl thiocyanate	Emphasizes mildness, speed, and recyclability; compatible with amides, peptides, and Fmoc solid-phase peptide synthesis	Simultaneously concerned with mild conditions, efficiency, and sustainability
Pyridinium activation route	CMPI (2-chloro-1-methylpyridinium iodide, Mukaiyama reagent)	Pyridinium-type activation	Used relatively early in peptide synthesis; studies showed that urethane-protected amino acids could undergo bond formation without racemization, but fragment coupling requires NHS-mediated interpretation of its practical boundary conditions	Want to compare the continuity between classical low-racemization routes and newer systems developed in recent years

Terminology Notes:

1. Ynamide: A class of compounds containing a carbon–carbon triple bond directly attached to a nitrogen atom.

2. Allenone: A class of reagents or intermediates containing an allenyl ketone framework; here it refers to allenone coupling systems used for low-racemization peptide bond formation.

3. Oxyma: The common name usually refers to ethyl 2-cyano-2-(hydroxyimino)acetate, a widely used anti-racemization additive in carbodiimide coupling.

4. TCFH–NMI: A combined system of N,N,N′,N′-tetramethylchloroformamidinium hexafluorophosphate (TCFH) and N-methylimidazole (NMI), which can generate highly reactive acyl imidazolium intermediates in situ.

5. NDTP: Refers to 5-nitro-4,6-dithiocyanatopyrimidine, a recyclable coupling reagent.

6. CMPI: Refers to 2-chloro-1-methylpyridinium iodide, commonly known as the Mukaiyama reagent.

The key differences among these routes lie in how each one controls the activation stage. Ynamide and allenone better represent a recent shift in methodology: rather than simply pursuing stronger activation, they seek a better balance between bond-forming efficiency and configuration retention through specifically designed reactive intermediates. The literature has already extended both approaches to more demanding tasks such as peptide fragment coupling and solid-phase peptide synthesis. By contrast, the significance of Oxyma is closer to an upgrade of established carbodiimide routes: it improves the activation pathway and lowers racemization risk within a familiar coupling framework. TCFH–NMI stands out for addressing difficult amide bond formation, NDTP places greater emphasis on the combination of mildness, speed, and recyclability, and CMPI reflects an earlier low-racemization activation strategy used in peptide synthesis.

4. Understanding low-racemization coupling systems through experimental questions

What laboratories truly face is the question of what most urgently needs to be solved at a given moment. The first step is to determine whether the core issue lies in configuration retention, substrate difficulty, workflow compatibility, or process burden. Different problems call for different systems to be prioritized.

Current Concern	Route Worth Prioritizing	Main Reason	What to Watch Out for in Use
Want to minimize the risk of configurational loss as much as possible in coupling chiral carboxylic acids or amino acids	Ynamide, Allenone, Oxyma-based routes	All three place the emphasis on controllability during the activation stage, though they achieve this in different ways	“Low racemization” reported in the literature should not be directly extrapolated to all substrates
The substrate itself is difficult to couple, such as combinations of sterically hindered carboxylic acids and weakly nucleophilic amines	TCFH–NMI	This system was designed specifically for difficult amide bond formation and is particularly suitable for overcoming insufficient driving force for bond formation	It is well suited to difficult couplings, but the substrate’s own sensitivity must still be considered when defining the usable condition window
Want to optimize an existing carbodiimide workflow rather than rebuild the entire route	Oxyma / Oxyma-derived systems	Easier to integrate with existing systems while also improving both anti-racemization performance and safety	Better understood as an optimization strategy for an existing route, not as a universal replacement for all other systems
Want to extend low-racemization thinking to peptide fragment coupling, solid-phase peptide synthesis, or more complex peptide chemistry tasks	Allenone, Ynamide, NDTP	These methods all have published examples beyond simple dipeptide models	Evaluation should consider the application level the literature has actually reached, not just the outcome of a single model reaction
Want to balance mild conditions, reaction efficiency, and sustainability	NDTP; some removable or recyclable ynamide systems	These methods place greater emphasis on recovery, byproduct handling, and greener directions	Claims of “greenness” should be judged together with actual recovery performance, workup difficulty, and scale-up conditions

5. The Most Common Misjudgments When Interpreting Low-Racemization / Low-Epimerization Coupling Routes

Common Misjudgment	Why It Easily Leads to Error	A More Reliable Way to Judge
Seeing “low racemization” or “racemization-free” in a paper and treating it directly as a universal conclusion	Many results are first established on specific model substrates, under specific conditions, or within a limited substrate scope	First examine under what substrates and at what task level the conclusion was obtained, and then judge whether it can reasonably be extrapolated to your own system
Looking only at yield or a single successful example and concluding that one route is superior	A high yield does not automatically mean better configuration retention, nor does it necessarily mean the route is better suited to complex tasks	Compare configuration retention, substrate scope, byproduct profile, and workup difficulty together
Treating results from simple amide or dipeptide models as directly equivalent to performance in fragment coupling or solid-phase peptide synthesis	A method that works well in a simple model does not necessarily retain the same advantages in more complex systems	Give priority to whether the literature has already advanced the method to peptide fragment coupling, solid-phase peptide synthesis, or higher-level tasks
Treating a route “suited for difficult couplings” as the universal first choice for all tasks	Routes for difficult coupling usually emphasize driving bond formation, but they are not necessarily the best starting point for every chiral substrate	First distinguish whether the main challenge is “difficulty of coupling” or “susceptibility to configurational loss”
Treating “recyclable” or “greener” as directly equivalent to a better overall process	Whether recovery is truly practical, whether workup is genuinely simplified, and whether scale-up remains stable may all affect the final judgment	Evaluation of greenness should take actual recovery, purification burden, and scale conditions into account together

6. Product Navigation Table for Low-Racemization Coupling Systems (Choose Table 1–Table 3 According to Research and Experimental Questions)

Current Research or Experimental Goal	Which Table to Prioritize	Why This Table Should Be Prioritized	Which Table to Read in Combination	Navigation Note
Want to first understand the representative new routes in low-racemization coupling systems and compare what kinds of problems different activation modes are best suited to solve	Table 1	Table 1 brings together representative activating reagents such as ynamide-type, Oxyma-derived, formamidinium-type, and Mukaiyama-type systems, making it the best starting point for building an overall understanding of different configuration-retention strategies	Then see Table 2	Starting with Table 1 helps determine whether priority should be given to newer systems that place greater emphasis on configuration retention, or whether comparison should return to classical highly activating systems and milder reference systems; if a triazine-type mild reference is also needed, DMTMM in Table 2 can be considered together.
Want to compare “new low-racemization reagents” with “classical peptide coupling reagents” in terms of coupling efficiency, configuration retention, and applicable substrates	Table 1	Table 1 corresponds directly to the main objects of study, making it easier to determine which new reagents should serve as the primary comparison set	Then see Table 2	In comparative studies, the new systems in Table 1 usually need to be designed in parallel with classical systems in Table 2 such as HATU, HBTU, PyBOP, PyAOP, and DCC/DIC/EDC·HCl in order to make the differences clearer.
Want to establish conditions for difficult amidation or difficult peptide coupling, such as sterically hindered carboxylic acids, poorly nucleophilic amines, or fragment couplings that are hard to condense	Table 1	TCFH, COMU, DEPBT, PyOxim, and ynamide-type reagents in Table 1 are better suited as initial choices for screening under these demanding conditions	Then see Table 3	Difficult coupling is not determined solely by the coupling reagent itself; it is also often affected by bases, additives, and promoting components. After choosing the main reagent, it is best to further optimize supporting conditions such as DIPEA, NMI, HOAt, and HOBt using Table 3.
Want to minimize racemization and side reactions as much as possible within a classical carbodiimide workflow and establish a more reliable basic coupling protocol	Table 3	Table 3 focuses on additives and auxiliary bases such as HOBt, HOAt, DIPEA, and NMI, which are often what truly determine the performance of carbodiimide-based routes, so it is the best starting point for building a basic condition framework	Then see Table 2	If classical carboxylic acid activators such as DCC, DIC, or EDC·HCl are used, the additives and bases in Table 3 usually need to be considered together with the carbodiimide reagents in Table 2 in order to clarify the relationship among “activator–additive–base.”
Want to compare the practical performance of uronium-type, phosphonium-type, and non-benzotriazole-type reagents in low-racemization coupling	Table 2	Table 2 places classical reference systems such as HATU, HBTU, HCTU, PyBOP, PyAOP, and DCC/DIC/EDC·HCl together, making it ideal for structured comparison	Then see Table 1	After first using Table 2 to establish the classical comparison framework, returning to Table 1 to examine COMU, PyOxim, DEPBT, DMTMM, and related systems makes the direction of improvement from “classical systems” to “new low-racemization systems” clearer.
Want to study the Oxyma route and compare Oxyma-derived reagents with traditional HOBt/HOAt additive-based routes	Table 1	Boc-Oxyma, COMU, PyOxim, and Oxyma-type additives in Table 1 best reflect the development of the Oxyma route from additive-based systems to derived coupling reagents	Then see Table 3 and Table 2	If the goal is to compare the Oxyma route with traditional benzotriazole additive-based routes, HOBt and HOAt in Table 3 should also be considered; if comparison with classical highly active reagents is also needed, Table 2 is the more appropriate reference.
Want to perform a three-level screen of “new systems + classical systems + additives/bases” and establish a more complete low-racemization condition-optimization scheme	Table 1	Table 1 is suitable as the starting point for choosing the main coupling reagent and defining the main research line	Then see Table 2 and Table 3	In practical condition optimization, it is often most consistent with actual screening workflow to first choose 1–2 key new systems from Table 1, then 1–2 classical strong reference systems from Table 2, and finally fine-tune bases and additives using Table 3.
Want to push low-racemization studies from simple models toward peptide coupling, fragment coupling, or methodology comparison	Table 1	Table 1 is more methodology-centered and is better suited to carrying the primary research question of whether a new activation mode is worth further development	Then see Table 2	If the work later advances into peptide coupling or fragment comparison, the classical highly active reagents in Table 2 are very common benchmarks and help determine whether a new system is effective only in simple models or also advantageous in more complex tasks.

Table 1 | Core Low-Racemization Activation Systems and Representative New Reagents

Category	CAS No.	Aladdin Catalog No.	Name	Specification / Purity	Product Features and Applications
Mukaiyama-type pyridinium activator	14338-32-0	C154059	2-Chloro-1-methylpyridinium Iodide	≥98%(T)	A classical pyridinium-type carboxylic acid activator, suitable for establishing relatively mild amidation or peptide-bond-forming conditions, and also commonly used to compare differences in activation mode versus uronium, phosphonium, or carbodiimide systems.
Benzotriazinone-type low-racemization coupling reagent	165534-43-0	D100524	3-(Diethoxyphosphoryloxy)-1,2,3-benzotriazin-4(3H)-one	≥98%	One of the coupling reagents noted for low-racemization performance; suitable for condition screening in couplings involving chiral carboxylic acids, amino acid derivatives, or peptide fragments, and also useful for parallel comparison with systems such as HATU, PyAOP, and COMU.
Oxyma-derived low-racemization coupling reagent	1426821-11-5	B932309	Boc-Oxyma	≥98%	An Oxyma-derived reagent that can be used to construct low-racemization coupling conditions within the Oxyma platform, and is also suitable for joint evaluation with Oxyma-type additives, COMU, PyOxim, and related systems in terms of activation efficiency and side-reaction control.
Oxyma-derived uronium coupling reagent	1075198-30-9	C340003	COMU	≥98%	A representative Oxyma-based uronium coupling reagent, commonly used for establishing conditions for difficult amidation and peptide coupling, and suitable for comparing Oxyma-based leaving groups with HOBt/HOAt-based systems in reaction efficiency and configuration retention.
Formamidinium-type low-racemization coupling reagent	94790-35-9	T117933	N,N,N',N'-Tetramethylchloroformamidinium hexafluorophosphate	≥98%	Commonly used together with 1-methylimidazole; suitable for generating highly reactive acyl-activation intermediates and for condition screening with difficult-to-couple substrates such as sterically hindered carboxylic acids and poorly nucleophilic amines.
Ynamide-type low-racemization coupling reagent	1005500-75-3	N397619	N-Ethynyl-N,4-dimethylbenzenesulfonamide	≥98%	One of the representative ynamide-type reagents, suitable for studying amidation and peptide-bond formation through the active vinyl ester pathway, and also for comparing configuration retention and side-reaction behavior with traditional uronium, phosphonium, and carbodiimide systems.
Ynamide-type low-racemization coupling reagent	1675790-91-6	N397622	N-Ethynyl-N-methylmethanesulfonamide	≥98%	Another type of ynamide-based low-racemization coupling reagent, suitable for side-by-side comparison with MYTsA to examine how different sulfonyl substituents affect activation behavior, substrate compatibility, and amide-bond-forming efficiency.
Oxyma-derived phosphonium coupling reagent	153433-21-7	P196188	PyOxim	≥98%	An Oxyma-based phosphonium coupling reagent, suitable for highly active amidation or peptide coupling, and also commonly used for comparison with reagents such as COMU, PyAOP, and PyBOP to evaluate the performance of phosphonium versus uronium routes.
Oxyma-B-type anti-racemization additive	5417-13-0	H679971	5-hydroxyimino-1,3-dimethyl-hexahydropyrimidine-2,4,6-trione	≥97%	A later-developed oxime-type anti-racemization additive that can be used together with carbodiimide systems such as DIC and EDC·HCl to compare how different oxime additives influence coupling efficiency, maintenance of optical purity, and side-reaction control.

Table 2 | Classical Coupling Reagents, Mild Reference Systems, and Low-Racemization Reference Systems

Category	CAS No.	Aladdin Catalog No.	Name	Specification / Purity	Product Features and Applications
Classical carbodiimide coupling reagent	538-75-0	D106074	N,N′-Dicyclohexylcarbodiimide	≥99%	A classical carboxylic acid activator, commonly used together with additives such as HOBt, HOAt, or Oxyma-type additives. It is suitable for establishing a traditional amidation baseline and also for comparing byproduct handling and the suppressive effects of low-racemization additives.
HOAt-type uronium coupling reagent	148893-10-1	H109327	HATU	≥99%	Commonly used for highly active peptide coupling and difficult amidation. It is suitable for evaluating coupling efficiency under highly reactive conditions and also serves as a commonly used strongly activating reference reagent for comparison with Oxyma-type or ynamide-type systems.
HOBt-type uronium coupling reagent	94790-37-1	H106174	HBTU	≥99%	A common peptide coupling reagent, suitable for establishing baseline uronium-type conditions and also for comparing how changes in leaving-group structure affect reaction reactivity and side-reaction control across systems such as HATU, HCTU, and COMU.
Classical carbodiimide coupling reagent	693-13-0	N420184	N,N′-Diisopropylcarbodiimide	≥98.5%	Very common in both solution-phase and solid-phase coupling. It is often used together with additives such as HOBt, HOAt, and Oxyma-type additives, and is well suited for low-racemization condition screening and carbodiimide-route optimization.
Water-soluble carbodiimide coupling reagent	25952-53-8	E106172	N-(3-Dimethylaminopropyl)-N′-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride	≥98%	A water-soluble carbodiimide suitable for amidation under relatively mild or aqueous-containing conditions. It is also appropriate for comparing coupling performance in different media when combined with additives such as Oxyma, HOBt, and HOAt.
HOBt-type phosphonium coupling reagent	128625-52-5	P109336	1H-Benzotriazol-1-yloxytripyrrolidinophosphonium Hexafluorophosphate	≥98%	A classical phosphonium-type peptide coupling reagent, suitable for relatively high-activity amidation and peptide coupling, and also useful for comparing differences between phosphonium and uronium routes against systems such as PyAOP, PyOxim, and HATU.
Chlorobenzotriazole-type uronium coupling reagent	330645-87-9	C106175	O-(6-Chlorobenzotriazol-1-yl)-N,N,N′,N′-tetramethyluronium hexafluorophosphate	≥98%	A chlorobenzotriazole-type uronium reagent suitable for improving activation efficiency. It is also appropriate for parallel evaluation with HBTU, HATU, COMU, and related systems to compare the effects of different leaving-group structures on coupling behavior.
HOAt-type phosphonium coupling reagent	156311-83-0	A109335	(7-Azabenzotriazol-1-yloxy)tripyrrolidinophosphonium hexafluorophosphate	≥97%	An HOAt-type phosphonium coupling reagent commonly used for screening difficult peptide couplings and fragment couplings. It is suitable for comparing configuration-retention performance under highly active conditions against systems such as PyBOP, HATU, and DEPBT.
Mild triazine-type dehydrative coupling reagent	3945-69-5	D110326	4-(4,6-Dimethoxy-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)-4-methylmorpholinium chloride hydrate (DMTMM)	≥97%	A mild, non-benzotriazole-type dehydrative coupling reagent suitable for establishing baseline reference conditions for amidation or peptide coupling, and also for comparing triazine-type activation pathways with uronium, phosphonium, and carbodiimide systems.

Table 3 | Anti-Racemization Additives and Supporting Bases / Promoting Components

Category	CAS No.	Aladdin Catalog No.	Name	Specification / Purity	Product Features and Applications
Non-nucleophilic organic base / acid scavenger	7087-68-5	D109322	N,N-Diisopropylethylamine	Distilled grade, ≥99.5%	A commonly used non-nucleophilic organic base that serves as both an acid scavenger and a basic promoting component in coupling reactions. It is suitable for use with uronium, phosphonium, and carbodiimide systems to evaluate how base strength affects coupling efficiency and side reactions.
Nucleophilic base / acyl-activation promoter	616-47-7	M109227	1-Methylimidazole	≥99%	Possesses both basicity and nucleophilic promoting effects. It is commonly used in combination with reagents such as TCFH and is suitable for establishing highly active coupling conditions through the acyl imidazolium pathway.
Anti-racemization additive	39968-33-7	H109328	1-Hydroxy-7-azabenzotriazole	≥99%	A commonly used highly efficient additive, suitable for use together with carboxylic acid activation systems such as DCC, DIC, and EDC·HCl to enhance coupling efficiency and evaluate suppression of racemization and side reactions.
Anti-racemization additive	123333-53-9	H106176	1-Hydroxybenzotriazole Monohydrate	≥97%	A classical peptide coupling additive, suitable for establishing baseline amidation conditions with carbodiimide systems, and also for comparing activation behavior and side-reaction suppression across different additives such as HOAt and Oxyma-type additives.

Note: The above are representative Aladdin products. For more product specifications, please refer to the product list at the end of the article, or search by “product name / CAS / catalog number” on the Aladdin official website.

References

1. Guo Y, Wang M, Gao Y, Liu G. Recent advances in asymmetric synthesis of chiral amides and peptides: racemization-free coupling reagents. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2024, 22, 4420–4435. DOI: 10.1039/D4OB00563E.

2. Hu L, Xu S, Zhao Z, et al. Ynamides as Racemization-Free Coupling Reagents for Amide and Peptide Synthesis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 13135–13138.

3. Hu L, Zhao J. Ynamide Coupling Reagents: Origin and Advances. Acc. Chem. Res. 2024, 57(6), 855–869. DOI: 10.1021/acs.accounts.3c00743.

4. Wang Z, Wang X, Wang P, Zhao J. Allenone-Mediated Racemization/Epimerization-Free Peptide Bond Formation and Its Application in Peptide Synthesis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 10374–10381. DOI: 10.1021/jacs.1c04614.

5. Subirós-Funosas R, Prohens R, Barbas R, El-Faham A, Albericio F. Oxyma: an efficient additive for peptide synthesis to replace the benzotriazole-based HOBt and HOAt with a lower risk of explosion. Chem. Eur. J. 2009, 15(37), 9394–9403. DOI: 10.1002/chem.200900614.

6. Beutner GL, Young IS, Davies ML, et al. TCFH–NMI: Direct Access to N-Acyl Imidazoliums for Challenging Amide Bond Formations. Org. Lett. 2018, 20(14), 4218–4222. DOI: 10.1021/acs.orglett.8b01591.

7. Li Y, et al. NDTP Mediated Direct Rapid Amide and Peptide Synthesis without Epimerization. Org. Lett. 2022, 24(5), 1169–1174. DOI: 10.1021/acs.orglett.1c04258.

8. Keese W, Gören H, Görtz KH, Reuschling D. 2-Chloro-1-methylpyridinium iodide. A suitable reagent for peptide synthesis. Biol Chem Hoppe Seyler. 1985;366(12):1093–1095.

9. Kekessie I, et al. Process Mass Intensity (PMI): A Holistic Analysis of Current Peptide Manufacturing Processes Informs Sustainability in Peptide Synthesis. J. Org. Chem. 2024, 89, 4261–4282. DOI: 10.1021/acs.joc.3c01494.

10. Duengo S, Muhajir MI, Hidayat AT, Musa WJA, Maharani R. Epimerisation in Peptide Synthesis. Molecules 2023, 28(24), 8017. DOI: 10.3390/molecules28248017.

For more related articles, see below:

A New Balance in Coupling Reagents: How DMT-TU Balances Reactivity, Racemization Control, and Thermal Hazard

From High Reactivity to Comprehensive Evaluation: Using CTSOAt as an Example to Understand the Design Logic of New Coupling Reagents

Knoevenagel Condensation Reaction

Understanding ATD-DMAP: From Reagent Design to Esterification, Amidation, and Stereochemical Integrity