Experimental Judgment for Differential Deprotection of Double Boc and Related N-Boc Systems: Substrate Type, Site-Response Differences, and Initial Condition Selection

Introduction

The key to selective mono-deprotection of double Boc systems lies in whether a sufficient difference in reaction rate can be established among the doubly protected substrate, the mono-deprotected intermediate, and the fully deprotected product. In conventional Boc deprotection, the usual requirement is simply that the starting material ultimately be converted into the deprotected product. In contrast, mono-deprotection of a double Boc system requires the mono-deprotected intermediate to accumulate to a meaningful level during the reaction and to be detected, isolated, or carried into the next step before it continues on to the fully deprotected product. If the two Boc sites respond similarly under the chosen conditions, even relatively mild conditions will often only slow the overall deprotection rate, while the reaction endpoint still remains dominated by full deprotection, making it difficult to establish a stable mono-deprotection stopping point. Boc deprotection is influenced simultaneously by the acid source, medium, and substrate structure. Whether a double Boc system can undergo mono-deprotection therefore depends on whether there is a reactivity difference between the two Boc sites that can be amplified under the selected conditions, and whether those conditions can convert that difference into operationally useful selectivity.

1. The Key Judgment Criteria Differ Between Conventional Boc Deprotection and Selective Mono-Deprotection of Double Boc Systems

Comparison dimension	Conventional Boc deprotection	Selective mono-deprotection of double Boc systems
Objective	Remove the Boc group to obtain the deprotected product	Remove only one Boc group while retaining the other
Primary focus	Whether deprotection proceeds smoothly	Whether the mono-deprotected intermediate can accumulate to a significant extent
Basis for evaluation	Whether the starting material is cleanly converted and whether the product can be obtained	The proportion and lifetime of the mono-deprotected species, and whether it can be detected, isolated, or carried into the next step
Direction of optimization	Whether deprotection can be achieved reliably while balancing yield, purity, and substrate compatibility	Whether the rate difference between the two deprotection events can be established or amplified
Common failure mode	No reaction, decomposition, or concurrent damage to other acid-sensitive groups	The reaction continues to full deprotection, with insufficient residence time of the mono-deprotected species
Experimental strategy	Adjust conditions around acid type, temperature, reaction time, and substrate tolerance	First determine the substrate type and the difference between the two Boc sites, then choose the condition class, and finally fine-tune equivalents and reaction time

2. Selective Mono-Deprotection Depends on a Reactivity Difference Between the Sites to Be Distinguished

Examples of selective mono-deprotection reported in the literature are mainly found in systems where the sites to be distinguished do not share the same chemical environment. Reported studies have shown that amide-type or carbamate-type N-Boc groups and ordinary amine-type N-Boc groups can display different reactivities under conditions such as magnesium perchlorate in acetonitrile. In N,N-dialkoxycarbonyl-protected amines (such as bis-Boc or Boc/Cbz types), different alkoxycarbonyl groups may also exhibit different cleavage sequences under LiBr/acetonitrile conditions. In amino acid and peptide derivatives, when an N-Boc group coexists with a tert-butyl ester or tert-butyl ether, differential deprotection can likewise be achieved under certain specific conditions.

These results do not represent the same substrate problem, but they share a clear common feature: the sites to be distinguished are not equivalent in electronic environment, neighboring functional-group effects, or order of response toward acidolysis. If the two sites targeted for cleavage are very similar in both electronic and steric environment, the more common experimental outcome is continued progression to full deprotection rather than formation of a stable mono-deprotection stopping point.

Reported substrate situations showing differential response	Main origin of the differential response
One N-Boc group is attached to an amide-type or carbamate-type nitrogen, while the other is closer to a typical amine-type nitrogen	The two sites respond differently to conditions such as magnesium perchlorate
N,N-Dialkoxycarbonyl-protected amines (such as bis-Boc or Boc/Cbz types)	The two alkoxycarbonyl groups are not fully equivalent and can show different cleavage sequences under LiBr/MeCN conditions
Coexistence of N-Boc with a tert-butyl ester or tert-butyl ether	Under certain conditions, the cleavage order of N-Boc differs from that of other tert-butyl acid-sensitive fragments
Bis-carbamate-type substrates on the same nitrogen	The second carbamate unit often changes the electronic environment around the adjacent nitrogen and carbonyl group, so the two deprotection steps are not necessarily iso-rate

3. Selecting Initial Screening Conditions According to Substrate Type

Substrate type	Conditions to prioritize in the initial screen	Basis for selection	Key point to monitor in the initial screen
One N-Boc group is attached to an amide-type or carbamate-type nitrogen, while the other is closer to a typical amine-type nitrogen	Magnesium perchlorate/acetonitrile	Stafford et al. reported that catalytic magnesium perchlorate in acetonitrile can mildly and selectively remove certain Boc-protected amides and carbamates, while simple Boc amines may remain unreactive.	Whether the mono-deprotected species accumulates clearly, or whether only the overall conversion rate slows down
N,N-Dialkoxycarbonyl-protected amines (such as bis-Boc or Boc/Cbz types)	Lithium bromide/acetonitrile	Hernández et al. reported that LiBr/acetonitrile can selectively cleave one alkoxycarbonyl group in N,N-dicarbamoyl-protected substrates. Such results are better treated as reference models for differential deprotection.	Which alkoxycarbonyl group is removed first; whether a second deprotection continues to occur
Nα-Boc amino acids or peptides bearing a tert-butyl ester or tert-butyl ether at the same time	4 M hydrogen chloride in anhydrous dioxane	Han et al. reported that this system can preferentially remove Nα-Boc groups from many amino acids and peptides and can distinguish tert-butyl esters from some tert-butyl ethers, but it is not suitable for phenolic tert-butyl ethers.	Whether N-Boc is removed preferentially; whether the tert-butyl ester or tert-butyl ether is cleaved simultaneously
The goal is to remove N-Boc preferentially while retaining the tert-butyl ester as much as possible	Concentrated sulfuric acid/tert-butyl acetate, or methanesulfonic acid systems; for amino acid-type substrates, CeCl3·7H2O/NaI may be added as a comparison	Lin et al. reported that concentrated sulfuric acid/tert-butyl acetate or methanesulfonic acid systems can remove Boc in the presence of tert-butyl esters. Marcantoni et al. additionally reported CeCl3·7H2O/NaI/acetonitrile for selective deprotection of N-Boc-protected tert-butyl ester amino acids, which can serve as a supplementary comparison condition for amino acid-type substrates.	Whether N-Boc removal is the dominant event; whether the tert-butyl ester is retained; whether substrate decomposition accompanies the reaction
Complex substrates that only require relatively mild N-Boc removal, with selective mono-deprotection of double Boc systems not being the main objective	85 wt% phosphoric acid; oxalyl chloride/methanol	Both 85 wt% phosphoric acid and oxalyl chloride/methanol are relatively mild methods for N-Boc deprotection. They are better used as controls for substrate compatibility or mild deprotection, and should not be regarded directly as priority screening conditions for selective mono-deprotection of double Boc systems.	Do not focus only on whether the “conditions are mild”; still determine whether an accumulable mono-deprotected species appears
Nα,Nα-bis-Boc amino acids or closely related bis-carbamate substrates on the same nitrogen	First check precedents within the same substrate series, then perform small-scale parallel screening	For this type of substrate, it is more appropriate to begin from literature precedents within the same series and compare a limited number of conditions, rather than extrapolating directly from general double Boc amine systems.	Whether epimerization, configurational drift, or other side reactions occur

Note:

85 wt% phosphoric acid and oxalyl chloride/methanol are better classified as relatively mild N-Boc deprotection conditions. They mainly show that certain substrates can be deprotected under milder conditions, but they are not directly equivalent to selective mono-deprotection of double Boc systems. Magnesium perchlorate/acetonitrile, LiBr/acetonitrile, 4 M hydrogen chloride in anhydrous dioxane, and CeCl3·7H2O/NaI for specific amino acid derivatives are more suitable for judging whether a usable differential response exists between different protected sites. Ultimately, whether mono-deprotection of a double Boc system is viable still depends on whether the mono-deprotected intermediate can accumulate significantly and persist long enough to be detectable, isolable, or usable in the next step.

4. Questions to Check First When Screening for Mono-Deprotection of Double Boc Systems

Screening stage	What should be determined first	Experimentally appropriate approach
Step 1	Whether the two sites to be distinguished are attached to the same type of nitrogen	First distinguish the type of nitrogen to which each Boc group is attached, such as a typical amine, amide, carbamate, amino acid-type nitrogen, or a bis-carbamate on the same nitrogen
Step 2	Which reported substrate class the substrate is closer to	First classify it according to the substrate situations listed above, then determine which condition class should be prioritized in the first round
Step 3	Whether to change the condition class first or fine-tune parameters first in the first round of screening	First compare different condition classes, then fine-tune acidity, equivalents, temperature, and time
Step 4	What signal should be used to judge whether mono-deprotection is possible	Use LC-MS or HPLC to track simultaneously the proportion changes of the starting material, mono-deprotected species, and fully deprotected species
Step 5	Under what circumstances the condition class should be changed	If the mono-deprotected species never accumulates to a significant extent, changing the condition class should take priority over simply extending the reaction time

5. Common Misjudgments in Mono-Deprotection of Double Boc Systems

Misjudgment	Common experimental manifestation	How to correct it
Repeatedly fine-tuning within one condition class without first grouping by substrate type	Results vary greatly among different substrates; some undergo mono-deprotection, some go directly to full deprotection; many parameters are changed, yet selectivity still does not improve clearly	First distinguish whether the substrate belongs to amide-type/carbamate-type N-Boc systems, related bis-carbamate protected models, or systems in which N-Boc coexists with a tert-butyl ester or tert-butyl ether, and then decide which condition class to prioritize
Treating relatively mild N-Boc deprotection directly as selective mono-deprotection	The conditions are mild, but the reaction still mainly proceeds to full deprotection	Separate the judgment of “good substrate compatibility” from the question of “whether a rate difference between the two deprotection events can be established”; do not equate relatively mild deprotection conditions directly with conditions for mono-deprotection of double Boc systems
Looking only at the endpoint and not at the reaction course	At the end of the reaction, only the fully deprotected product is observed, making it impossible to tell whether the mono-deprotected species ever formed	Use LC-MS or HPLC to track the relative amounts of starting material, mono-deprotected species, and fully deprotected species, with emphasis on whether the mono-deprotected species appears during the reaction and remains at an analytically meaningful level
Treating increased basicity as the default optimization direction for amino acid-type substrates	In addition to mono-deprotection, configurational changes or other side reactions may also occur	For amino acid or peptide substrates, basic conditions should be evaluated by small-scale parallel screening; if the system contains a stereogenic center, retention of configuration should be monitored alongside deprotection rather than judging only whether deprotection occurs
Ignoring tert-butyl-related side reactions during acidolysis	Additional impurities appear in peptide or multifunctional substrates, increasing the purification burden	For acid-sensitive, multifunctional, or peptide systems, side reactions should be assessed in addition to deprotection conversion; if necessary, suitable scavengers may be considered to reduce side reactions triggered by reactive tert-butyl-derived species formed during acidolysis

6. Product Navigation Table for Research on Double Boc and Related Differential Deprotection Systems (Tables 1–3)

Research or experimental objective	Which table to consult first	Why this table should be consulted first	Which table to consult in combination	Navigation note
To first establish the basic condition framework for double Boc mono-deprotection experiments	Table 1	Table 1 brings together Boc installation reagents, conventional acid deprotection references, and components for controlling acidolysis side reactions	Then see Tables 2 and 3	This is suitable for first defining substrate preparation, conventional full-deprotection controls, and means of controlling side reactions
To compare conventional strong-acid full deprotection with controlled acidic conditions and determine whether the mono-deprotected species can appear or persist	Table 1	Table 1 is better suited for establishing a conventional full-deprotection reference	Then see Table 2	First use Table 1 to establish the full-deprotection baseline, then use Table 2 to compare whether the mono-deprotected species can be observed under controlled acidic conditions
When the substrate contains both N-Boc and other tert-butyl acid-sensitive fragments such as tert-butyl esters or tert-butyl ethers, and the goal is to determine whether N-Boc can be removed preferentially	Table 2	Table 2 focuses on controlled acidic conditions and relatively mild N-Boc deprotection conditions	Then see Tables 1 and 3	This is suitable for comparing the deprotection sequence of N-Boc versus other tert-butyl fragments under different acid systems
When the substrate is sensitive to strong acid and the goal is to evaluate relatively mild N-Boc deprotection routes first	Table 2	Conditions such as phosphoric acid and oxalyl chloride/methanol in Table 2 are better suited for screening relatively mild deprotection conditions	Then see Table 1	The key comparisons are substrate integrity, functional-group compatibility, and whether overcleavage occurs. Both 85 wt% phosphoric acid and oxalyl chloride/methanol belong to relatively mild N-Boc deprotection conditions.
To use differences between substrate sites to study mono-deprotection selectivity, with emphasis on Lewis acids, salt-mediated conditions, or non-classical conditions	Table 3	Table 3 focuses on conditions such as Mg(ClO4)2, LiBr, and CeCl3·7H2O/NaI	Then see Tables 1 and 2	This is suitable for comparing differences in response between different site environments under differential deprotection conditions. Mg(ClO4)2/acetonitrile corresponds to selective deprotection of amide- or carbamate-type N-Boc groups, while LiBr/acetonitrile corresponds to differential cleavage in related bis-carbamate protection models.
To carry out an initial screen for double Boc mono-deprotection and first determine which class of conditions should be used	Table 3	The condition classes in Table 3 differ markedly from one another, making it easier to quickly distinguish which deprotection pathway the substrate is more likely to follow	Then see Table 2	First use Table 3 to judge whether a differential response exists, then use Table 2 to refine the acidic conditions
When decomposition, increasing impurities, or tert-butyl-related side reactions have already been observed and cleaner reaction profiles are desired	Table 1	The conventional acid deprotection references and scavengers in Table 1 are better suited for troubleshooting side reactions	Then see Table 2	This is suitable for first checking the combination of acid source, medium, and scavenger, and then deciding whether to continue optimizing a controlled-acid route

Table 1 | Substrate Construction, Conventional Acid Deprotection References, and Side-Reaction Control Components

Category	CAS No.	Aladdin Catalog No.	Name	Specification or Purity	Product Features and Applications
Boc installation reagent	24424-99-5	D106159	Di-tert-butyl dicarbonate	≥99%	Used for preparing mono-Boc or bis-Boc model substrates, facilitating comparison of the rate difference between the first and second deprotection events and providing a substrate basis for subsequent mono-deprotection condition screening.
Conventional fast de-Boc acid reference	76-05-1	T433655	Trifluoroacetic acid (TFA)	Anhydrous grade, ≥99%	Commonly used as a strong-acid reference for rapid N-Boc deprotection, suitable for establishing a “conventional full deprotection” control and judging whether milder or more differentiating conditions truly lead to accumulation of the mono-deprotected species.
Common medium for conventional acid deprotection	75-09-2	D433565	Dichloromethane	Anhydrous grade, ≥99.8%, containing 40–150 ppm amylene as stabilizer	Commonly used together with TFA or certain Lewis acid systems. Suitable as an aprotic, low-boiling medium for comparing rapid full deprotection with differential deprotection on the same substrate.
Scavenger for acidolysis side reactions	617-86-7	T106570	Triethylsilane (NSC 93579)	≥98%	As a hydride-type scavenger, it can reduce addition, alkylation, or decomposition side reactions triggered by tert-butyl-related reactive intermediates during acidolysis.
Scavenger for acidolysis side reactions	100-68-5	T107511	Methyl phenyl sulfide	≥99%	As a thioether-type scavenger, it can help quench highly reactive intermediates generated during strong-acid deprotection and is suitable for use in acid-based condition exploration when the substrate is prone to side reactions.

Table 2 | Components for Controlled Acidic Conditions and Mild N-Boc Deprotection Conditions

Category	CAS No.	Aladdin Catalog No.	Name	Specification or Purity	Product Features and Applications
HCl-type controlled-acid de-Boc condition	7647-01-0	H399975	Hydrochloric acid solution	4 M solution in 1,4-dioxane	Corresponds to HCl/1,4-dioxane-type deprotection conditions. Suitable for comparing this system with conventional TFA routes in terms of N-Boc removal rate, site selectivity, and substrate compatibility, and can also be used to examine differential deprotection behavior when N-Boc coexists with tert-butyl esters or certain tert-butyl ethers.
Acid source for differential deprotection of N-Boc versus tert-butyl esters	7664-93-9	S485807	Sulfuric acid 98%	Guaranteed reagent grade, suitable for analysis, ≥98%	Under strongly acidic conditions with controlled equivalents, it can be used to distinguish the deprotection response of N-Boc versus tert-butyl esters and is suitable for small-scale screening of amino acid or peptide-like substrates.
Acid source for differential deprotection of N-Boc versus tert-butyl esters	75-75-2	M433629	Methanesulfonic acid	Suitable for synthesis	Suitable as the acid source for a methanesulfonic acid route, which remains a strong-acid route but is easier to handle, for comparison with sulfuric acid routes in terms of deprotection rate, selectivity, and side reactions.
Mild de-Boc acid source	7664-38-2	P112025	Phosphoric acid	Chromatographic HPLC grade, ≥85%	85% phosphoric acid can serve as a relatively mild N-Boc deprotection condition and is suitable for evaluating whether greater functional-group integrity can be retained when the substrate is sensitive to strong acid.
Activating reagent for mild de-Boc conditions	79-37-8	O434200	Oxalyl chloride	Reagent grade, high purity, ≥99%	Can form a relatively mild de-Boc system in methanol and is suitable as an alternative route when conventional strong acids readily cause overdeprotection or decomposition.
HCl-type controlled acidic medium	123-91-1	D431640	1,4-Dioxane	Anhydrous grade, ≥99.8%	A typical medium for the HCl/dioxane route, suitable for observing response differences between N-Boc and other acid-sensitive fragments under low-water conditions.
Reaction medium for oxalyl chloride de-Boc conditions	67-56-1	M140298	Methanol	Anhydrous grade, ≥99.8%, H2O ≤100 ppm	A key medium for the oxalyl chloride mild de-Boc route, suitable for evaluating whether substrates can undergo deprotection smoothly under milder conditions without excessive cleavage.
Medium for differential deprotection of N-Boc versus tert-butyl esters	540-88-5	B110958	Tert-butyl acetate	≥99%	Commonly found in condition sets using concentrated sulfuric acid or methanesulfonic acid to distinguish N-Boc from tert-butyl esters. Suitable for comparative experiments centered on whether N-Boc is removed first or whether the tert-butyl ester is removed at the same time.

Table 3 | Lewis Acid-/Salt-Mediated and Double Boc Mono-Deprotection Screening Systems

Category	CAS No.	Aladdin Catalog No.	Name	Specification or Purity	Product Features and Applications
Salt-mediated mono-deprotection reagent	7550-35-8	L433600	Lithium bromide	Anhydrous grade, high purity, reagent grade, ≥99%	Can serve as the core reagent in salt-mediated conditions in acetonitrile and is suitable for evaluating whether one alkoxycarbonyl group can be selectively removed from N,N-dialkoxycarbonyl-protected amino compounds.
Iodide salt used with rare-earth-salt differential deprotection	7681-82-5	S433814	Sodium iodide	Anhydrous grade, high purity, reagent grade, ≥99%	Commonly used together with cerium(III) chloride heptahydrate and suitable for examining response differences between N-Boc and tert-butyl esters in amino acid-type substrates.
Reaction medium for Lewis acid-/salt-mediated systems	75-05-8	A119012	Anhydrous acetonitrile (ACN)	Anhydrous grade, ≥99.8%, H2O ≤0.003%	A common medium for systems such as Mg(ClO4)2, LiBr, and CeCl3·7H2O/NaI, suitable for comparing the intrinsic differences among different mono-deprotection pathways under low-water conditions.
Exploratory basic deprotection condition	1310-66-3	L431778	Lithium hydroxide monohydrate	UltraBio™, ultrapure grade, ≥99%(T)	Can serve as an exploratory comparison condition for specific bis-carbamate model substrates and should not be directly extrapolated as a preferred general route for double Boc mono-deprotection.
Rare-earth-salt differential deprotection reagent	18618-55-8	C432245	Cerium(III) chloride heptahydrate	purum p.a., ≥98%(AT)	When used with NaI/acetonitrile, it is suitable for comparing the differential deprotection response of N-Boc versus tert-butyl esters in amino acid or peptide-like substrates.
Lewis-acid selective mono-deprotection reagent	10034-81-8	M431154	Magnesium perchlorate	puriss., ≥99% (calculated on dry substance, KT), powder	In acetonitrile, it can be used for mild selective deprotection of certain Boc-protected amides or Boc-protected carbamates, and can be compared with the response of simple Boc amines, making it suitable for comparing the effect of different site environments on deprotection.
Lewis-acid de-Boc comparison condition	7699-45-8	Z292530	Zinc bromide	PrimorTrace™, super dry, ≥99.99% metals basis	Can be used as an exploratory comparison condition for Lewis-acid-type de-Boc chemistry, for comparison with systems such as Mg(ClO4)2 in terms of substrate response and side reactions.
Strong Lewis-acid de-Boc comparison condition	27607-77-8	T398981	Trimethylsilyl trifluoromethanesulfonate (TMSOTf)	≥99%	Can be used as a relatively fast exploratory Lewis-acid-type de-Boc condition for comparing reaction rate and substrate compatibility with ZnBr2 and Mg(ClO4)2.
Exploratory nucleophilic deprotection condition	7803-57-8	H104517	Hydrazine monohydrate	≥98%(T)	Can serve as an exploratory comparison condition for specific bis-carbamate model substrates and is suitable for parallel comparison of substrate sensitivity with acid-based and Lewis-acid-based methods.

Note: The above are representative Aladdin products. For more product specifications, please refer to the product list at the end of the article or search on the Aladdin website using the “product name/CAS/catalog number.”

References

[1] Wuts PGM. Greene’s Protective Groups in Organic Synthesis. 5th ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2014.

[2] Kocienski PJ. Protecting Groups. 3rd ed. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme Verlag; 2005.

[3] Isidro-Llobet A, Álvarez M, Albericio F. Amino acid-protecting groups. Chemical Reviews. 2009;109(6):2455-2504. doi:10.1021/cr800323s.

[4] Stafford JA, Brackeen MF, Karanewsky DS, Valvano NL. A highly selective protocol for the deprotection of BOC-protected amides and carbamates. Tetrahedron Letters. 1993;34(49):7873-7876. doi:10.1016/S0040-4039(00)61498-3.

[5] Hernández JN, Ramírez MA, Martín VS. A new selective cleavage of N,N-dicarbamoyl-protected amines using lithium bromide. The Journal of Organic Chemistry. 2003;68(3):743-746. doi:10.1021/jo026300b.

[6] Lin LS, Lanza T Jr, de Laszlo SE, Truong Q, Kamenecka T, Hagmann WK. Deprotection of N-tert-butoxycarbonyl (Boc) groups in the presence of tert-butyl esters. Tetrahedron Letters. 2000;41(36):7013-7016. doi:10.1016/S0040-4039(00)01203-X.

[7] Han G, Tamaki M, Hruby VJ. Fast, efficient and selective deprotection of the tert-butoxycarbonyl (Boc) group using HCl/dioxane (4 M). Journal of Peptide Research. 2001;58(4):338-341. doi:10.1034/j.1399-3011.2001.00935.x.

[8] Marcantoni E, Massaccesi M, Torregiani E, Bartoli G, Bosco M, Sambri L. Selective deprotection of N-Boc-protected tert-butyl ester amino acids by the CeCl3·7H2O−NaI system in acetonitrile. The Journal of Organic Chemistry. 2001;66(12):4430-4432. doi:10.1021/jo010010y.

[9] Li B, Berliner M, Buzon RA, Chiu CK-F, Colgan ST, Kaneko T, et al. Aqueous phosphoric acid as a mild reagent for deprotection of tert-butyl carbamates, esters, and ethers. The Journal of Organic Chemistry. 2006;71(24):9045-9050. doi:10.1021/jo061377b.

[10] George N, Ofori S, Parkin S, Awuah SG. Mild deprotection of the N-tert-butyloxycarbonyl (N-Boc) group using oxalyl chloride. RSC Advances. 2020;10:24017-24026. doi:10.1039/D0RA04110F.

[11] Ashworth IW, Cox BG, Meyrick B. Kinetics and mechanism of N-Boc cleavage: evidence of a second-order dependence upon acid concentration. The Journal of Organic Chemistry. 2010;75(23):8117-8125. doi:10.1021/jo101767h.

For more related articles, please see below:

Selection Logic for Hydroxyl Protecting Groups: Deprotection Conditions, Task Differentiation, and Orthogonal Combination Design

Selective Deprotection and Sulfonyl Group Migration of N-Aryl Sulfonamides Mediated by TfOH (Trifluoromethanesulfonic Acid): Reaction Patterns and Synthetic Implications

Reconsidering N-Acyl Amino Protecting Groups: Deprotection Differences, Strategic Roles, and Experimental Selection of Ac, Bz, and Tfa

The Core Value of the Trityl Family of Protecting Groups: Acid-Deprotection Hierarchies and Selective Route Design

From the Logic of Deprotection to Protecting Group Choice: Differences Among Bn, PMB, and Dmb in Experimental Design