Experimental Selection of Burgess Reagent: A Decision Framework for Alcohol Dehydration, Primary Amide/Aldoxime Dehydration, and Oxazoline/Thiazoline Cyclization

1. Typical Tasks for Burgess Reagent and the Situations in Which It Merits Priority Consideration

Burgess reagent is a commonly used inner-salt dehydrating reagent that can be applied under relatively mild conditions for alcohol dehydration, amide or aldoxime dehydration, and certain cyclodehydration reactions. Unless otherwise specified, this article refers throughout to the classical monomeric Burgess reagent. In experimental route selection, this article focuses on several typical tasks: dehydration of secondary and tertiary alcohols to alkenes, dehydration of primary amides or aldoximes to nitriles, and cyclization of β-hydroxy amides or β-hydroxy thioamides to form oxazolines or thiazolines. Whether it is worth prioritizing Burgess reagent depends mainly on the substrate type, the target product type, and whether the reaction requires activation followed by elimination or activation followed by intramolecular cyclization under relatively mild conditions. For dehydration of secondary and tertiary alcohols and for oxazoline or thiazoline formation, this class of reagent often has clear practical value. By contrast, for the direct dehydration of primary alcohols to terminal alkenes, it is usually not the preferred option.

1.1 In Which Experimental Tasks Is Burgess Reagent Worth Prioritizing?

Current experimental task	Is Burgess reagent worth prioritizing?	Key points for evaluation
Dehydration of secondary alcohols to alkenes	Often worth prioritizing	One of its most classical applications, especially suitable for systems where strong acid dehydration conditions are best avoided
Dehydration of tertiary alcohols to alkenes	Can be considered, but requires more caution than secondary alcohols	Reactions are often faster, but regioselectivity and possible rearrangement must be evaluated carefully
Direct dehydration of primary alcohols to terminal alkenes	Usually should not be prioritized	Primary alcohols more often form carbamates, so this is not an advantageous application for this route
Dehydration of primary amides to nitriles	Strongly worth considering	Suitable for substrates that are sensitive to stronger dehydration conditions
Dehydration of aldoximes to nitriles	Worth considering	Suitable when aldoxime dehydration is desired under relatively mild conditions
Cyclization of β-hydroxy amides to oxazolines	Often worth prioritizing	Site activation, intramolecular cyclization, and dehydrative ring closure can be achieved under one set of conditions
Cyclization of β-hydroxy thioamides to thiazolines	Often worth prioritizing	Suitable for cyclodehydration to thiazolines
Development-stage work emphasizing green scale-up, cost, and process robustness	Requires separate evaluation	Cost, solvent choice, scale-up feasibility, and alternative routes all need to be assessed together

2. Experimental Decision Points When Burgess Reagent Is Used for Alcohol Dehydration

When Burgess reagent is used for alcohol dehydration, it is generally better suited to secondary and tertiary alcohols. A representative feature of this reagent is that, under relatively mild conditions, it proceeds through an activated intermediate followed by syn elimination to generate an alkene. Tertiary alcohols often react more rapidly, but greater attention must be paid to whether an eliminable β-H is present, whether the substrate conformation supports syn elimination, and what regioselectivity will result. Secondary alcohols, in many cases, more readily provide a more controllable dehydration outcome. Primary alcohols, by contrast, are usually not preferred substrates for this route, because the reaction more readily diverts toward carbamate formation.

2.1 What Types of Substrates Are More Suitable for Considering Burgess Reagent in Alcohol Dehydration?

Substrate type or experimental objective	Assessment of Burgess reagent	Main experimental points to monitor
Sensitive secondary alcohols where strong acid dehydration is to be avoided	Often suitable for priority screening	Whether the stereochemical arrangement supports syn elimination, and whether side reactions are fewer than in acid-catalyzed systems
Tertiary alcohols where rapid alkene formation is the goal	Can be tried, but should not be assumed optimal by default	Whether an eliminable β-H is available, whether the substrate conformation supports syn elimination, and the resulting regioselectivity
Primary alcohols where the target is a terminal alkene	Usually not preferred as a first choice	The reaction is more likely to form a carbamate
Allylic alcohols or skeletons prone to rearrangement	Requires caution	Whether rearrangement or a multi-product distribution occurs
Complex skeletons with multiple competing β-H atoms	Must be judged case by case based on substrate structure	Whether the regioselectivity matches the substrate conformation and the disposition of the β-H atoms

3. When to Use Burgess Reagent for Dehydration of Amides or Aldoximes to Nitriles

In addition to alcohol dehydration, Burgess reagent can also be used for the dehydration of primary amides and aldoximes to nitriles. In addition, N-substituted formamide-type precursors can be dehydrated under Burgess conditions to give isocyanides. For transformations of this type, the key experimental question is usually not simply whether “one molecule of water can be removed,” but whether the substrate can undergo dehydration under relatively mild conditions while minimizing the impact of harsher dehydration systems on sensitive functional groups. Both primary amide-to-nitrile and aldoxime-to-nitrile transformations are supported by representative literature reports, and aldoxime dehydration can also be carried out using PEG-supported Burgess reagent.

3.1 Precursor Evaluation When Burgess Reagent Is Used for Dehydration to Nitriles

Precursor type	Target product	When to consider Burgess reagent	Main experimental points to monitor
Primary amide	Nitrile	When the substrate is sensitive to stronger dehydration conditions, or when dehydration under relatively mild conditions is desired	Whether there is an alternative process that is more suitable for scale-up or offers simpler workup
Aldoxime	Nitrile	When dehydration under relatively mild conditions is desired and the use of more aggressive dehydration systems is to be avoided	Whether the oxime-forming step is operationally simple, and whether the overall route still retains an efficiency advantage

At the process development and scale-up stage, although this primary amide-to-nitrile dehydration step can be carried out using Burgess reagent, whether it should continue to be used must still be judged comprehensively in light of solvent selection, cost, workup, and scale-up feasibility.

4. When It Is Suitable for Oxazoline or Thiazoline Cyclization

Burgess reagent can be used for the cyclodehydration of β-hydroxy amides and β-hydroxy thioamides to generate oxazolines and thiazolines, respectively. Representative literature reports show that serine and threonine derivatives can be converted to oxazolines under Burgess reagent conditions. PEG-supported Burgess reagent can likewise be used for cyclodehydration of β-hydroxy amides and β-hydroxy thioamides.

These reactions are suitable for substrates that need to undergo site activation, intramolecular cyclization, and dehydrative ring closure within a single set of conditions, especially serine-, threonine-, and related sulfur-containing precursor derivatives. In the literature, these transformations often show good retention of stereochemical information, but experimental evaluation should still verify whether adjacent stereogenic centers remain stable.

In these reactions, Burgess reagent typically affords oxazolines or thiazolines directly. If the target is an oxazole or thiazole, a separate subsequent oxidation step is required.

4.1 Key Evaluation Points When Burgess Reagent Is Used for Heterocycle-Forming Cyclization

Current objective	Assessment of Burgess reagent	Main experimental points to monitor
Construction of oxazolines from β-hydroxy amides	Often worth prioritizing	Whether adjacent stereogenic centers are retained and whether the workup is straightforward
Construction of thiazolines from β-hydroxy thioamides	Often worth prioritizing	Whether purification proceeds smoothly and whether subsequent oxidation or derivatization is convenient
Targeting heteroaromatic rings such as oxazoles or thiazoles	Can be considered, but requires a stepwise design	Cyclization and subsequent oxidation should be evaluated separately
Peptide-like or natural-product-like sensitive substrates	Often worth considering	Whether cyclization can be completed under relatively mild conditions while controlling side reactions

5. Route-Selection Considerations for Burgess Reagent in Process Development and Scale-Up

The preceding discussion focused on substrate type and target transformation type. Once the work enters process development and scale-up, the evaluation should shift further toward solvent systems, workup difficulty, cost, supply, and scale-up feasibility. Under laboratory conditions, Burgess reagent can be used for alcohol dehydration, amide or aldoxime dehydration, and oxazoline or thiazoline cyclization. At the process stage, however, whether to continue using this reagent must be reassessed in the context of the overall synthetic route.

5.1 Additional Questions That Need to Be Evaluated During Process Development and Scale-Up

Evaluation dimension	What needs to be considered	Impact on the choice of Burgess reagent
Reagent and solvent	Reagent supply, cost, storage stability, and whether the process depends on a specific solvent system	Determines whether the route is suitable for continued scale-up
Workup and separation	Removal of by-products, purification steps, and whether telescoping is practical	Affects process simplicity and yield consistency
Scale-up performance	Heat release, mass transfer, reproducibility, and batch-to-batch stability	Affects whether laboratory conditions can be transferred smoothly to larger scale
Alternative routes	Whether there are dehydration or nitrile-forming methods more suitable for scale-up	Determines whether Burgess reagent still remains the preferred choice

6. Product Navigation Table for Burgess Reagent Dehydration, Nitrile Formation, and Heterocycle Cyclization (Choose Tables 1–4 by Research or Experimental Objective)

Research or experimental objective	Which table to consult first	Why this table should be consulted first	Which table to consult in combination	Why it should also be consulted
To first determine whether Burgess reagent is better suited to alcohol dehydration, nitrile formation, or heterocycle cyclization	Table 1	Table 1 brings together the core reagent, anhydrous medium, and model substrates for alcohol dehydration, making it suitable for building an initial understanding of the basic task types for which Burgess reagent is applicable	Tables 2 and 3	Table 2 supplements evaluation of nitrile precursors, while Table 3 supplements evaluation of oxazoline and thiazoline cyclization precursors, helping separate the three task types
To establish basic conditions for dehydration of secondary and tertiary alcohols to alkenes and compare the reaction behavior of different alcohol classes	Table 1	Table 1 focuses on Burgess reagent itself, anhydrous acetonitrile, and representative secondary and tertiary alcohol substrates, making it suitable for judging alcohol dehydration conditions	Table 2	Table 2 helps distinguish which oxygen- or nitrogen-containing precursors are more suitable for nitrile-forming routes, avoiding direct comparison of alcohol dehydration and dehydration of nitrogen-containing precursors within the same task category
To determine whether primary alcohols are suitable for direct dehydration using Burgess reagent	Table 1	Table 1 includes primary, secondary, and tertiary alcohol controls, making it easier to compare reaction differences among alcohol classes	Table 2	Table 2 supplements evaluation of dehydration routes involving nitrogen-containing precursors and helps clarify whether some substrates should instead enter the target product from amide or oxime precursors
To compare the two routes of primary amide dehydration to nitriles and aldoxime dehydration to nitriles, and determine which precursor class is better suited to the current substrate	Table 2	Table 2 focuses on primary amides, aldoximes, and the corresponding nitrile references, making it suitable for evaluating nitrile precursors	Table 1	Table 1 supplements the applicable range of Burgess reagent in alcohol dehydration and helps distinguish whether the current substrate is more closely aligned with a nitrile-forming task or an alkene-forming task
To distinguish whether dehydration of N-substituted formamides to isocyanides and dehydration of primary amides to nitriles belong to the same class of experimental task	Table 2	Table 2 lists both formamides and primary amides, making it easier to distinguish the two target types, isocyanide formation and nitrile formation	Table 1	Table 1 serves as a background reference for dehydration tasks and helps determine whether the current research focus belongs to alcohol dehydration, nitrile formation, or another dehydration transformation
To establish an oxazoline or thiazoline cyclodehydration route starting from serine, threonine, or cysteine skeletons	Table 3	Table 3 focuses on serine, threonine, cysteine, and their common protected precursors, making it suitable for evaluating amino-acid-based cyclization routes	Table 4	Table 4 supplements methyl ester precursors that are closer to actual charge materials and downstream derivatization operations, facilitating comparison of how different precursor organizations affect cyclization handling
To compare the impact of different protecting-group systems such as Boc, Fmoc, and Fmoc/Trt on the preparation of downstream cyclization substrates	Table 3	Table 3 places common protecting-group systems together, making it easier to compare protecting strategies and how they connect with subsequent cyclization	Table 4	Table 4 supplements use scenarios for methyl ester precursors and helps determine whether changes in the protecting-group system require concurrent adjustment of precursor format
To start directly from amino acid methyl ester precursors that are closer to actual coupling, derivatization, and cyclization operations	Table 4	Table 4 focuses on serine, threonine, and cysteine methyl ester hydrochlorides and their protected methyl ester precursors, making it more relevant to actual precursor assembly and cyclization operations	Table 3	Table 3 supplements the corresponding free-acid and basic protected precursors, making it easier to compare methyl ester routes with routes based on the parent skeletons
To compare which types of experimental arrangement are more suitable for parent skeleton precursors versus methyl ester precursors	Table 3	Table 3 is better for first clarifying skeleton type and protecting-group system, and then deciding whether to shift to methyl ester precursors	Table 4	Table 4 further supplements precursor formats that are closer to direct charging and downstream transformation, facilitating comparison of the operational organization of the two route types
To conduct preliminary screening by grouping tasks first rather than comparing all substrates in a single round of conditions	Tables 1 and 2	Table 1 is more suitable for alcohol dehydration assessment, and Table 2 is more suitable for nitrile precursor assessment; taken together, they allow dehydration to alkenes and dehydration to nitriles to be separated at the outset	Tables 3 and 4	Tables 3 and 4 supplement precursors related to heterocycle cyclization and help manage cyclodehydration tasks separately from the first two dehydration task categories

Table 1 | Core Dehydrating Reagent, Anhydrous Medium, and Model Substrates for Alcohol Dehydration

Category	CAS No.	Aladdin Cat. No.	Name	Specification or Purity	Product Features and Applications
Core inner-salt dehydrating reagent	29684-56-8	M138624	(Methoxycarbonylsulfamoyl)triethylammonium hydroxide, inner salt	≥96%	A classical mild inner-salt dehydrating reagent that can be used for dehydration of secondary or tertiary alcohols, dehydration of primary amides and aldoximes, as well as cyclodehydration starting from β-hydroxy amides or sulfur-containing precursors.
Anhydrous polar reaction medium	75-05-8	A119012	anhydrous Acetonitrile(ACN)	Anhydrous grade, ≥99.8%, H2O≤0.003%	A commonly used anhydrous, aprotic polar medium, suitable for condition screening in Burgess-reagent-mediated dehydration or cyclization. Lower water content helps reduce consumption of the reagent and sensitive precursors by water.
Boundary-control substrate for primary alcohols	100-51-6	B163018	Benzyl alcohol	Pharmaceutical grade, PharmPure™	Suitable as a boundary-control substrate for primary alcohols. It is more useful for observing whether primary alcohols under Burgess conditions tend to give carbamate-type products rather than directly and efficiently producing alkenes.
Model substrate for dehydration of secondary alicyclic alcohols	108-93-0	C110399	Cyclohexanol	Standard for GC, ≥99%(GC)	A typical model secondary alicyclic alcohol, suitable for establishing baseline conditions for dehydration of a secondary alcohol to cyclohexene, and for comparing the effects of temperature, solvent, and charge ratio on conversion.
Model substrate for dehydration of secondary benzylic alcohols	98-85-1	P103660	DL-1-Phenylethyl Alcohol	≥98%	Suitable for evaluating dehydration efficiency and regioselectivity of a secondary benzylic alcohol under Burgess conditions, and also convenient for reactivity comparison with alicyclic alcohol substrates.
Activated diarylmethanol-type substrate	91-01-0	D106394	Diphenylmethanol	≥99%	A relatively easily activated diarylmethanol-type substrate, suitable for examining the effects of benzylic stabilization on dehydration rate and product distribution.
Model substrate for dehydration of tertiary alicyclic alcohols bearing a β-H	590-67-0	M102063	1-Methylcyclohexanol	≥96%	Suitable for establishing dehydration conditions for tertiary alcohols bearing a β-H, and for observing alkene-forming ability under Burgess conditions as well as the reaction differences relative to secondary alcohols.
Boundary-control substrate for tertiary alcohols lacking a β-H	76-84-6	T106629	Triphenylmethanol	≥99%	Suitable as a boundary-control substrate for tertiary alcohols without a β-H, helping distinguish that not all tertiary alcohols can generate alkenes through the usual dehydration pathway.

Table 2 | Dehydration Precursors from Primary Amides, N-Substituted Formamides, and Aldoximes, with Reference Target Products of Nitriles/Isocyanides

Category	CAS No.	Aladdin Cat. No.	Name	Specification or Purity	Product Features and Applications
Dehydration precursor of a primary aliphatic amide	60-35-5	A108462	Acetamide	Moligand™, sublimed grade, ≥99.8%	A typical model primary aliphatic amide, suitable for evaluating the feasibility and conversion efficiency of forming an aliphatic nitrile from a primary amide under Burgess conditions.
Dehydration precursor of a primary aromatic amide	55-21-0	B118608	Benzamide	Sublimed grade, ≥99.5%	A classical primary aromatic amide precursor, suitable for examining dehydration from amide to aromatic nitrile and for comparing precursor types with the aldoxime route.
Reference precursor for isocyanide formation from formamide-type substrates	75-12-7	F755739	Formamide	UltraBio™, molecular biology grade, ≥99.5%(T)	Suitable for distinguishing between the task of dehydrating formamide-type precursors to isocyanides and that of dehydrating primary amides to nitriles.
Dehydration precursor of an aliphatic aldoxime	107-29-9	A108687	Acetaldoxime	≥99%	A typical model aliphatic aldoxime, suitable for comparing the differences between dehydration of aldoximes to nitriles and dehydration of primary amides to nitriles under Burgess conditions.
Dehydration precursor of an aromatic aldoxime	932-90-1	B768539	Benzaldoxime	≥95%, mainly E isomer	Suitable for condition screening for dehydration of an aromatic aldoxime to benzonitrile, and for observing the effects of oxime geometry and substrate electronic properties on reaction behavior.
Reference aromatic nitrile product	100-47-0	B119686	Benzonitrile	Anhydrous grade, ≥99%	Suitable as a reference product or analytical standard for an aromatic nitrile target, facilitating monitoring of retention behavior and purity of the target product after dehydration of benzamide or benzaldoxime.

Table 3 | Fundamental Amino Acid Scaffolds and N-Protected Precursors for Oxazoline/Thiazoline Cyclization

Category	CAS No.	Aladdin Cat. No.	Name	Specification or Purity	Product Features and Applications
Fundamental scaffold precursor for oxazolines	56-45-1	S432938	(S)-(+)-Serine	Moligand™, suitable for synthesis	Provides a β-hydroxy amino acid scaffold, suitable for subsequent construction of serine-derived N-acyl cyclization precursors before entering the oxazoline-forming step.
Fundamental scaffold precursor for oxazolines	72-19-5	L433393	L-Threonine	UltraBio™, ultrapure grade, ≥99.5%(NT)	Provides a hydroxy amino acid scaffold bearing a β-methyl substituent, suitable for comparing substituent effects and stereochemical influences during cyclization of threonine-derived precursors.
Fundamental scaffold precursor for thiazolines	52-90-4	L755721	L-Cysteine	UltraBio™, ≥98.5%(RT)	Provides a sulfur-containing amino acid scaffold, suitable for subsequent construction of cysteine-derived cyclization precursors. Attention should be paid to thiol oxidation and protection strategy during use.
Boc-protected oxazoline precursor	3262-72-4	B109001	N-(tert-Butoxycarbonyl)-L-serine	≥97%	Suitable for first introducing N-terminal Boc protection, then constructing serine-derived oxazoline cyclization precursors through acylation, for solution-phase precursor preparation.
Boc-protected oxazoline precursor	2592-18-9	B615342	N-Boc-L-threonine	≥99%(HPLC)	Suitable for constructing controlled threonine-derived cyclization precursors, making it easier to compare the effects of β-substitution on cyclodehydration efficiency and stereochemical outcome.
Boc-protected thiazoline precursor	20887-95-0	B484479	Boc-L-cysteine	≥98%	Suitable for preparing N-acyl precursors derived from cysteine before thiazoline cyclization. During use, both thiol oxidation and protection arrangements should be considered.
Fmoc-protected oxazoline precursor	73724-45-5	F103020	Fmoc-Ser-OH	≥97%	Suitable for constructing serine precursors under orthogonal protection strategies, facilitating connection with N-terminal management in peptide-like fragments or multistep synthesis.
Fmoc-protected oxazoline precursor	73731-37-0	F113135	N-Fmoc-L-threonine Monohydrate	≥98%	Suitable for constructing threonine-derived cyclization precursors in the Fmoc system, for subsequent acylation and scaffold extension before oxazoline formation.
Fmoc/Trt doubly protected thiazoline precursor	103213-32-7	F100409	Fmoc-Cys(Trt)-OH	≥98%	Suitable for constructing more complex cysteine-derived precursors under conditions that simultaneously control amino and thiol reactivity. Before thiazoline cyclization, the trityl protecting group usually needs to be removed first.

Table 4 | Amino Acid Methyl Ester Precursors and Boc-Protected Methyl Ester Precursors for Oxazoline/Thiazoline Cyclization

Category	CAS No.	Aladdin Cat. No.	Name	Specification or Purity	Product Features and Applications
Serine methyl ester-type precursor for oxazolines	5680-80-8	S109008	L-Serine methyl ester hydrochloride	≥98%	Suitable as a starting point for serine methyl ester-type precursors, for subsequent construction of N-acyl cyclization precursors before entering the oxazoline-forming step. In use, the hydrochloride salt form usually needs to be addressed first.
Threonine methyl ester-type precursor for oxazolines	39994-75-7	T117005	L-Threonine methyl ester hydrochloride	≥98%	Suitable as a starting point for threonine methyl ester-type precursors, making it easier to examine the effect of β-methyl substitution on subsequent oxazoline cyclization precursor construction and cyclization outcome. In use, the hydrochloride salt form usually needs to be addressed first.
Cysteine methyl ester-type precursor for thiazolines	18598-63-5	C105474	L-Cysteine methyl ester hydrochloride	≥98%	Suitable as a starting point for cysteine methyl ester-type precursors, for subsequent construction of sulfur-containing cyclization precursors before entering the thiazoline-forming step. During use, attention should be paid to both hydrochloride salt handling and thiol oxidation.
Boc-protected serine methyl ester precursor	2766-43-0	B116726	Boc-Ser-OMe	≥95%	A serine methyl ester precursor closer to actual charge materials, facilitating continued organization of deprotection, acylation, and subsequent cyclization steps once the methyl ester has already been introduced.
Boc-protected threonine methyl ester precursor	79479-07-5	I134027	N-Boc-L-threonine methyl ester	≥95%	Suitable for use as a threonine methyl ester-type precursor, allowing continued construction of downstream oxazoline cyclization precursors under clearly defined protection status.
Boc-protected cysteine methyl ester precursor	55757-46-5	N351956	N-(tert-Butoxycarbonyl)-L-cysteine methyl ester	≥97%	Suitable as a starting point for sulfur-containing cysteine methyl ester-type precursors, allowing continued organization of downstream precursor construction under controlled N-terminal conditions. Before thiazoline cyclization, thiol management still requires attention.

Note: The above are representative Aladdin products. For more product specifications, please refer to the product list at the end of the article, or search the Aladdin website using the “product name/CAS/catalog number.”

References

[1] Atkins GM Jr, Burgess EM. The reactions of an N-sulfonylamine inner salt. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 1968;90(17):4744-4745. DOI: 10.1021/ja01019a052.

[2] Burgess EM, Penton HR Jr, Taylor EA, Williams WM. Conversion of primary alcohols to urethanes via the inner salt of methyl (carboxysulfamoyl)triethylammonium hydroxide: methyl n-hexylcarbamate. Organic Syntheses. 1977;56:40. DOI: 10.15227/orgsyn.056.0040.

[3] Claremon DA, Phillips BT. An efficient chemoselective synthesis of nitriles from primary amides. Tetrahedron Letters. 1988;29(18):2155-2158. DOI: 10.1016/S0040-4039(00)86697-6.

[4] Creedon SM, Crowley HK, McCarthy DG. Dehydration of formamides using the Burgess reagent: a new route to isocyanides. Journal of the Chemical Society, Perkin Transactions 1. 1998;(6):1015-1018. DOI: 10.1039/A708081F.

[5] Miller CP, Kaufman DH. Mild and efficient dehydration of oximes to nitriles mediated by the Burgess reagent. Synlett. 2000;(8):1169-1171. DOI: 10.1055/s-2000-6752.

[6] Khapli S, Dey S, Mal D. Burgess reagent in organic synthesis. Journal of the Indian Institute of Science. 2001;81:461-476.

[7] Wipf P, Miller CP. A short, stereospecific synthesis of dihydrooxazoles from serine and threonine derivatives. Tetrahedron Letters. 1992;33(7):907-910. DOI: 10.1016/S0040-4039(00)91572-7.

[8] Wipf P, Venkatraman S. An improved protocol for azole synthesis with PEG-supported Burgess reagent. Tetrahedron Letters. 1996;37(27):4659-4662. DOI: 10.1016/0040-4039(96)00918-5.

[9] Wipf P, Hayes GB. Synthesis of oxazines and thiazines by cyclodehydration of hydroxy amides and thioamides. Tetrahedron. 1998;54(25):6987-6998. DOI: 10.1016/S0040-4020(98)00341-X.

[10] Hjerrild P, Tørring T, Poulsen TB. Dehydration reactions in polyfunctional natural products. Natural Product Reports. 2020;37(8):1043-1064. DOI: 10.1039/D0NP00009D.

[11] Kincaid JRA, Caravez JC, Iyer KS, et al. A sustainable synthesis of the SARS-CoV-2 Mpro inhibitor nirmatrelvir, the active ingredient in Paxlovid. Communications Chemistry. 2022;5(1):156. DOI: 10.1038/s42004-022-00758-5.

[12] Galli M, Migliano F, Fasano V, Silvani A, Passarella D, Citarella A. Nirmatrelvir: From discovery to modern and alternative synthetic approaches. Processes. 2024;12(6):1242. DOI: 10.3390/pr12061242.

For more related articles, see below:

Burgess reagent

What Is Thiazoline? Structural Features, Functional Value, Application Areas, and Research Selection Strategies

DAST-Mediated Amidation at Room Temperature: Method Features, Practical Value, and Scope of Applicability