Principles, System Types, and Experimental Application Design of Cell-Free Protein Synthesis Systems
Principles, System Types, and Experimental Application Design of Cell-Free Protein Synthesis Systems
A cell-free protein synthesis (CFPS) system is an in vitro reaction platform that uses cell lysates or reconstituted translation systems to synthesize target proteins from DNA, PCR products, or mRNA templates. This system operates independently of cell growth, transformation screening, and host toxicity constraints, making it suitable for toxic proteins, membrane proteins, difficult-to-express proteins, unnatural amino acid incorporation, rapid protein screening, synthetic biology circuit validation, and small-scale functional verification.
Keywords: cell-free protein synthesis; CFPS; in vitro translation; cell lysate; PURE system; membrane protein expression; unnatural amino acid; rapid protein screening
1 Basic Components of Cell-Free Protein Synthesis Systems
1.1 Reaction System Composition
(1) Genetic template
CFPS can use plasmid DNA, linear DNA, PCR products, or mRNA as templates. Plasmid DNA has relatively good stability and is suitable for routine expression and method optimization. PCR products do not require cloning and are suitable for high-throughput screening and rapid validation of mutants. mRNA templates bypass the transcription step and are suitable for analyzing translation efficiency and the influence of mRNA structure on protein yield. Linear DNA and PCR templates are susceptible to nuclease degradation, so terminal protection structures or nuclease inhibition strategies usually need to be optimized.
(2) Transcription and translation machinery
DNA-template-based CFPS requires RNA polymerase for transcription and relies on ribosomes, tRNAs, aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases, initiation factors, elongation factors, and termination factors for translation. Cell lysate systems usually retain these components and are relatively easy to operate. Reconstituted systems use purified components for reassembly, offering lower background and stronger controllability, but they are more costly and require more intensive component optimization.
(3) Substrates and energy system
Protein synthesis requires 20 amino acids, ATP, GTP, nucleotides, magnesium ions, potassium ions, buffer components, and an energy regeneration system. Common energy substrates include phosphoenolpyruvate, creatine phosphate, 3-phosphoglycerate, maltodextrin, and glucose-related systems. The energy system affects not only yield but also pH, inorganic phosphate accumulation, and effective magnesium ion concentration, thereby influencing translation duration.
(4) Auxiliary factors and reaction environment
Magnesium ions, potassium ions, disulfide bond-forming environments, molecular chaperones, detergents, liposomes, nanodiscs, and membrane-mimicking systems affect protein folding, solubility, and activity. When expressing soluble enzymes, membrane proteins, disulfide bond-containing proteins, or proteins containing unnatural amino acids, the same reaction composition should not be directly applied without adjustment.
Table 1 Core components of cell-free protein synthesis systems and their experimental roles
Component Type | Representative Components | Main Function | Experimental Focus |
Genetic template | Plasmid DNA, PCR product, linear DNA, mRNA | Provides coding information for the target protein | Purity, concentration, promoter, UTR, degradation risk |
Transcription system | T7 RNA polymerase, SP6 RNA polymerase, endogenous RNA polymerase | Generates mRNA from DNA | Promoter matching, transcription efficiency, mRNA stability |
Translation system | Ribosomes, tRNAs, translation factors, aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases | Synthesizes polypeptide chains | Extract quality, translation factor activity, ionic conditions |
Substrate system | Amino acids, nucleotides, energy substrates | Supports protein synthesis reaction | Substrate concentration, batch stability, energy regeneration efficiency |
Folding assistance | Molecular chaperones, redox buffer, DsbC, PDI | Promotes correct folding and disulfide bond formation | Suitable for complex proteins or secretory proteins |
Membrane-mimicking system | Detergents, liposomes, nanodiscs, microsomal membranes | Supports membrane protein insertion and stabilization | Membrane environment, protein activity, downstream purification strategy |
Detection system | Fluorescent proteins, radioactive labeling, Western blot, activity assay | Determines expression level and function | Distinguishes total expression, soluble expression, and functional expression |
1.2 Major System Types
(1) Escherichia coli lysate system
The E. coli lysate system has fast reaction kinetics, relatively high yield, and comparatively low cost. It is suitable for prokaryotic proteins, enzymes, screening-based expression, and high-throughput optimization. Its main limitations are the lack of complex eukaryotic post-translational modification capability and the need for additional system engineering or reaction condition optimization for complex disulfide bond proteins, glycoproteins, and some membrane proteins.
(2) Wheat germ system
The wheat germ system is a eukaryotic source system suitable for expressing some eukaryotic proteins, protein complexes, and target proteins that are unfavorable in prokaryotic systems. This system has relatively low background nuclease and protease activities and a comparatively mild protein folding environment. However, reaction rate and cost usually differ from E. coli systems, making it suitable for structural and functional studies and eukaryotic protein screening.
(3) Rabbit reticulocyte lysate system
The rabbit reticulocyte lysate system is suitable for mRNA template translation, eukaryotic protein expression, and some translation regulation studies. This system contains eukaryotic translation factors and a relatively complete translation environment, but it has higher requirements for template design, mRNA quality, and reaction background control.
(4) Insect cell and mammalian cell lysate systems
Insect cell, HeLa cell, and other mammalian-derived systems are closer to complex eukaryotic expression environments. They are suitable for some membrane proteins, multidomain proteins, post-translational modification-related studies, and preparation of drug target proteins. These systems are more costly, and yield, background, and batch consistency need to be carefully validated.
(5) PURE reconstituted system
The PURE system is reconstituted from purified ribosomes, translation factors, tRNAs, aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases, and energy components. It has defined composition, low background, and strong controllability, making it suitable for mechanistic studies, orthogonal translation systems, genetic code expansion, and synthetic biology circuit construction. Its main limitations are high cost and limited support for protein folding and complex modifications.
Table 2 Common CFPS system types and application selection
System Type | Main Advantages | Suitable Applications | Main Limitations |
E. coli lysate system | Fast reaction, high yield, low cost | Enzymes, prokaryotic proteins, high-throughput screening | Lacks complex eukaryotic modifications |
Wheat germ system | Eukaryotic source, relatively mild folding environment | Eukaryotic proteins, structural and functional screening | Cost and yield require separate evaluation |
Rabbit reticulocyte lysate system | Suitable for mRNA translation and eukaryotic translation studies | Translation regulation, eukaryotic protein expression | Higher requirements for template and background control |
Insect cell lysate system | More suitable for some complex eukaryotic proteins | Drug targets, membrane proteins, modification-related proteins | Higher system cost |
Mammalian cell lysate system | Closer to mammalian translation environment | Human proteins, functional proteins, drug development | Yield and batch stability require validation |
PURE reconstituted system | Defined composition, low background, strong controllability | Genetic code expansion, synthetic circuits, mechanistic studies | High cost, limited folding assistance |
2 Key Parameters in CFPS Experimental Design
2.1 Template Design and Template Quality
(1) Promoter and regulatory elements
DNA templates should match the RNA polymerase used in the reaction system. The T7 promoter is commonly used in E. coli lysate and PURE systems. The template should also include a properly designed ribosome binding site, start codon, stop codon, and 5′/3′ untranslated regions. Eukaryotic systems depend more strongly on mRNA cap structure, poly(A) tail, or UTR designs suitable for translation initiation.
(2) Template format
Plasmid DNA generally has better stability and is suitable for standard expression. PCR templates are suitable for rapid screening of mutants, domain boundaries, and tag positions. mRNA templates are suitable for directly evaluating translation efficiency. Linear DNA and PCR templates may be degraded by nucleases after entering the lysate; if necessary, protective sequences, nuclease inhibitors, or systems better suited for linear templates can be used.
(3) Template purity
Salt, ethanol, phenol, guanidine salts, EDTA, and protein contamination may inhibit transcription or translation reactions. After template preparation, concentration, integrity, and purity should be confirmed. PCR products in particular require removal of residual primers, dNTPs, polymerase, and buffer salts.
2.2 Ionic Conditions and Energy Regeneration
(1) Magnesium ions
Magnesium ions affect ribosome structure, tRNA binding, ATP/GTP utilization, and nucleic acid stability, and are among the most sensitive parameters in CFPS. Insufficient magnesium ions reduce translation efficiency, whereas excessive magnesium may cause nonspecific precipitation or translation inhibition. Magnesium concentration should be re-optimized for different templates, energy substrates, and lysate batches.
(2) Potassium ions
Potassium ions affect ribosome activity, protein folding, and the overall translation environment. E. coli systems are usually sensitive to potassium salt concentration, and eukaryotic systems also require ionic strength suitable for the translation machinery. Potassium optimization should be considered together with magnesium rather than adjusted independently.
(3) Energy substrates
The energy regeneration system determines reaction duration and yield. Phosphoenolpyruvate can supply energy rapidly, but byproducts and inorganic phosphate accumulation may affect the reaction. 3-Phosphoglycerate, creatine phosphate, maltodextrin, or glucose-related systems can be used to extend reaction duration or reduce cost. When selecting an energy system, yield, pH stability, cost, and target protein activity should be considered together.
2.3 Reaction Mode and Detection Strategy
(1) Batch reaction
Batch reactions are simple to operate and are suitable for expression condition screening, template comparison, tag validation, and high-throughput reactions. Their limitations are rapid substrate depletion, product inhibition, and byproduct accumulation, so reaction duration is usually limited.
(2) Continuous exchange reaction
Continuous exchange systems use a semipermeable membrane or compartmentalized structure to continuously replenish substrates and remove small-molecule byproducts, extending reaction time and increasing yield. This mode is suitable for yield scale-up, structural protein preparation, and protein synthesis requiring longer reaction times.
(3) Continuous-flow reaction
Continuous-flow systems enable substrate feeding, reaction volume scale-up, and more stable system control. They are suitable for process research and automated platform development. Design priorities include reactor structure, flow rate, template stability, and product collection efficiency.
(4) Detection strategy
CFPS results should distinguish “total expression,” “soluble expression,” and “functional product.” Fluorescent proteins are suitable for rapid reporting of expression capacity. SDS-PAGE and Western blot are suitable for detecting molecular weight and expression bands. Enzyme activity, binding assays, ligand response, or cell-based functional assays are used to confirm whether the protein has the intended function.
Table 3 Key CFPS parameters and optimization directions
Parameter | Affected Step | Common Problem | Optimization Direction |
Template concentration | Transcription and translation initiation | Insufficient expression when too low; reaction inhibition when too high | Establish a template concentration gradient |
Promoter/RBS/UTR | mRNA generation and translation initiation | mRNA is present but protein yield is low | Optimize promoter, RBS, or UTR structure |
Magnesium ions | Ribosome and nucleic acid stability | Low yield, precipitation, or high background | Perform magnesium gradient optimization for each system |
Potassium ions | Translation efficiency and protein folding | Fluctuating translation efficiency | Optimize together with magnesium ions |
Energy system | Reaction duration | Premature reaction termination, pH drift | Replace energy substrate or buffer system |
Reaction temperature | Translation rate and folding | Rapid expression but poor solubility | Lower temperature or extend reaction time |
Redox environment | Disulfide bond formation | Inactive or mismatched protein | Add redox buffer and folding enzymes |
Membrane-mimicking system | Membrane protein insertion | Aggregation or loss of function | Add liposomes, nanodiscs, or microsomal membranes |
3 Applications of CFPS in Difficult-to-Express and Functional Protein Preparation
3.1 Toxic Protein Expression
(1) Avoiding host toxicity
When toxic proteins are expressed in cells, they may inhibit host growth, disrupt metabolism, damage cell membranes, or destabilize expression strains. CFPS does not rely on live cell proliferation and can directly synthesize target proteins in vitro, reducing host selection pressure during cloning and induced expression.
(2) Expression process control
When expressing toxic proteins, reaction volume, template concentration, reaction time, and product exposure risk should be controlled. If the protein has nuclease, protease, or membrane-disrupting activity, inactive mutants, no-template controls, and post-reaction inactivation steps should be included to avoid effects on system components and operators.
(3) Result verification
Successful toxic protein expression should not be judged only by an expression band. Purification results, activity assays, substrate specificity, and stability evaluation should be combined to distinguish full-length expression, degradation products, and nonspecific aggregation.
3.2 Membrane Protein Expression
(1) Requirement for membrane environment
Membrane proteins require a hydrophobic environment to maintain their conformation. Direct expression in aqueous CFPS systems can easily lead to aggregation or inactivation. Adding detergents, liposomes, nanodiscs, microsomal membranes, or artificial membrane systems can improve membrane protein insertion, folding, and functional detection.
(2) System selection
E. coli lysates are suitable for some prokaryotic membrane proteins and rapid screening. Wheat germ, insect cell, or mammalian systems are more suitable for some eukaryotic membrane proteins and complex drug targets. If the target protein requires glycosylation, disulfide bonds, or membrane localization-related modifications, systems containing microsomal membranes or eukaryotic-derived systems should be prioritized.
(3) Functional evaluation
After membrane protein expression, ligand binding, transport activity, receptor signaling, antibody recognition, or structural integrity should be examined. An SDS-PAGE band alone cannot prove that the membrane protein is correctly folded or inserted into the membrane environment.
3.3 Disulfide Bond-Containing and Complex Folding Proteins
(1) Redox conditions
Disulfide bond-containing proteins require an appropriate redox environment. Reducing components in cell lysates may hinder disulfide bond formation. This can be improved by adjusting the glutathione redox buffer system, adding disulfide bond isomerases, or pretreating lysates to reduce the reducing background.
(2) Folding auxiliary factors
DsbC, PDI, molecular chaperones, prolyl isomerases, and other auxiliary factors can improve folding efficiency of complex proteins. Therapeutic proteins, antibody fragments, cytokines, and multidisulfide proteins usually require simultaneous evaluation of expression level and activity.
(3) Activity detection
Functional assays should be prioritized for evaluating complex folded proteins. Catalytic activity can be measured for enzymes; ligand binding or antibody recognition can be measured for receptors or binding proteins; cell function or target response can be measured for therapeutic proteins.
4 Applications of CFPS in Synthetic Biology and R&D Platforms
4.1 Unnatural Amino Acids and Genetic Code Expansion
(1) Orthogonal translation system
CFPS can incorporate unnatural amino acids site-specifically into target proteins by adding an orthogonal tRNA/aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase pair. The composition of the in vitro system is controllable, which facilitates adjustment of unnatural amino acid concentration, stop codon suppression efficiency, and competitive translation conditions.
(2) Special protein design
Unnatural amino acids can be used to introduce fluorescent groups, crosslinking groups, click chemistry handles, photoreactive groups, or stabilizing structures. This strategy is suitable for protein labeling, structural analysis, drug conjugation, and functional regulation studies.
(3) Interpretation points
Unnatural amino acid incorporation experiments should confirm the proportion of full-length protein, misincorporation rate, truncated products, and modification efficiency at the target site. Mass spectrometry verification is more suitable than fluorescence or band detection alone for confirming site-specific incorporation.
4.2 High-Throughput Protein Screening
(1) Rapid template construction
PCR products can be directly used in CFPS reactions, making them suitable for domain boundary screening, mutant library screening, tag position comparison, and early-stage protein engineering validation. This mode reduces cloning time and accelerates candidate protein screening.
(2) Microplate reactions
CFPS can be carried out in small-volume reactions in microplates and is suitable for throughput testing of expression level, solubility, enzyme activity, fluorescence signal, or binding ability. After reaction miniaturization, evaporation, edge effects, and pipetting error should be re-evaluated.
(3) Data screening
High-throughput results should include positive template, negative template, no-template, and system background controls. Candidates with high expression but low function may have folding problems, while candidates with low expression but high activity may be more suitable for subsequent scale-up optimization.
4.3 Gene Circuit and Biosensor Validation
(1) Gene circuit prototyping
CFPS can be used to rapidly validate promoters, RBSs, riboswitches, transcription factors, and feedback loops in vitro. Because the system does not include cell growth or metabolic adaptation processes, it is suitable for analyzing the response logic of the circuit itself.
(2) Biosensors
In vitro biosensors can be constructed by combining transcription/translation systems with small-molecule-responsive elements. Such systems can be used in environmental detection, metabolite screening, pathogen-related signal detection, and field-deployable rapid testing platforms.
(3) Boundary conditions
In vitro circuit results are not necessarily identical to intracellular results. After transfer into cells, plasmid copy number, resource competition, metabolic state, protein degradation, and cell growth can alter circuit behavior. Therefore, CFPS is more suitable as a platform for prototype validation and parameter screening.
Table 4 CFPS application scenarios and experimental evaluation indicators
Application Direction | Main Goal | Recommended System | Key Evaluation Indicators |
Toxic protein expression | Avoid host death and expression inhibition | E. coli lysate, PURE system | Expression level, integrity, activity, safety handling |
Membrane protein preparation | Improve membrane protein expression and folding | Eukaryotic lysate, system with membrane mimics | Soluble/membrane-bound ratio, ligand binding, functional activity |
Therapeutic protein validation | Rapidly obtain functional protein | Eukaryotic system or optimized lysate system | Folding state, disulfide bonds, cell function |
Unnatural amino acid incorporation | Construct site-specifically modified proteins | PURE system, E. coli lysate | Full-length product, site incorporation rate, mass spectrometry results |
High-throughput mutant screening | Rapidly compare candidate variants | PCR template + microplate CFPS | Expression level, solubility, enzyme activity, or binding ability |
Gene circuit validation | Test regulatory elements and response logic | PURE system, lysate system | Fluorescence output, dynamic range, background signal |
In vitro biosensor | Detect small-molecule or nucleic acid signals | Lyophilized CFPS or portable system | Sensitivity, specificity, stability |
5 CFPS Result Interpretation and Common Problems
5.1 Low Expression Level
(1) Template problems
Insufficient template concentration, promoter mismatch, unreasonable RBS or UTR design, and excessive PCR residual inhibitors can all lead to low expression. The source of the problem can be identified by changing template format, optimizing the 5′ sequence, improving template purity, and including a positive template.
(2) Insufficient system activity
Cell lysate batch differences, excessive freeze-thaw cycles, decreased ribosome activity, or imbalance in the energy system can affect expression. A standard reporter protein should be used as a system quality control to avoid misinterpreting system inactivation as difficult expression of the target protein.
(3) Mismatched reaction conditions
Mismatched magnesium ions, potassium ions, temperature, reaction time, or energy substrate can reduce yield. Optimization should begin with a small matrix rather than changing only one parameter at a time and directly concluding that the system has failed.
5.2 Insoluble or Inactive Protein
(1) Insufficient folding
After expression, the target protein may form aggregates or misfolded products. Folding can be improved by lowering reaction temperature, extending reaction time, adding molecular chaperones, optimizing the redox environment, or switching to a eukaryotic system.
(2) Missing modifications
Glycosylation, phosphorylation, disulfide bonds, lipid modification, or membrane insertion can be essential for the function of some proteins. When these modifications are absent, the protein may remain inactive even if expression is high. Such targets should use more suitable eukaryotic lysates, microsomal membrane systems, or downstream in vitro modification strategies.
(3) Mismatched detection method
Some proteins are sensitive to tag position, buffer, cofactors, or substrate conditions. If the activity assay is negative, incompatibility of the assay system, insufficient cofactors, or tag interference should be excluded.
5.3 High Background or Poor Reproducibility
(1) Endogenous background
Lysates may contain endogenous proteins, nucleic acids, and metabolite background. When detecting low-expression proteins or weakly active proteins, no-template controls, blank template controls, and unrelated template controls should be included.
(2) Reaction system fluctuation
Microvolume reactions are susceptible to pipetting error, evaporation, and edge effects. In high-throughput experiments, replicate wells, randomized layout, and intra-plate standards should be used to control batch differences.
(3) Product degradation
Protease activity, nuclease activity, or intrinsic instability of the target protein can cause product degradation. Protease inhibitors can be added, reaction time optimized, temperature lowered, or lysate source changed.
Table 5 Common CFPS problems and optimization directions
Problem | Possible Cause | Optimization Direction |
No expression or weak expression | Template degradation, promoter mismatch, system inactivation | Include a positive template; optimize template quality and promoter design |
mRNA present but protein low | Unsuitable RBS/UTR, weak translation initiation | Optimize translation initiation elements and 5′ structure |
High total expression but low solubility | Insufficient folding, reaction too fast, temperature too high | Lower temperature, add molecular chaperones, or change system |
Disulfide bond-containing protein inactive | Inappropriate redox environment | Add GSSG/GSH, DsbC, or PDI |
Membrane protein aggregation | Lack of membrane environment | Add liposomes, nanodiscs, detergents, or microsomal membranes |
Poor high-throughput reproducibility | Pipetting error, evaporation, plate position effect | Increase replicate wells, seal plates, and include intra-plate standard controls |
High background signal | Endogenous lysate background or detection interference | Include no-template and no-substrate controls |
6 Related Product and Material Selection
Table 6 Products and materials related to cell-free protein synthesis systems
Application Module | Cat. No. | Product Name | Grade/Specification | Application Positioning |
Core reaction system | Cell-Free Protein Synthesis Kit | BioReagent;for protein analysis | Used for routine CFPS reactions, rapid target protein expression, and small-scale protein analysis | |
Core reaction system | Cell-Free Protein Synthesis Kit (Lyophilized) | BioReagent;for protein analysis | Used for lyophilized CFPS systems, suitable for storage stability, portable reactions, and batch experimental design | |
Disulfide bond protein expression | Cell-Free Protein Synthesis Kit Max | BioReagent;for protein analysis | Used for disulfide bond-containing proteins, secretory proteins, antibody fragments, and complex folded protein expression | |
Solubility-enhanced expression | Cell-Free Protein Synthesis Kit Pro | BioReagent;for protein analysis | Used for aggregation-prone proteins, low-solubility proteins, and targets requiring improved soluble expression ratio | |
Disulfide bond protein expression | Cell-Free Protein Synthesis Kit Max (Lyophilized) | BioReagent;for protein analysis | Used for lyophilized disulfide bond-enhanced CFPS systems, suitable for disulfide bond-containing protein expression and stabilized reaction preparation | |
Solubility-enhanced expression | Cell-Free Protein Synthesis Kit Pro (Lyophilized) | BioReagent;for protein analysis | Used for lyophilized solubility-enhanced CFPS systems, suitable for difficult-to-solubilize proteins, screening-based expression, and portable protein synthesis experiments | |
Template preparation | EnzymoPure™ DNA Polymerase | EnzymoPure™, free of DNA endonuclease and exonuclease, phosphatase, and RNase. | Used to amplify CFPS linear DNA templates, expression cassettes, or screening PCR products | |
Template preparation | EnzymoPure™ High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase | EnzymoPure™, This product is free from RNase, phosphatase, and DNA endonuclease. | Used for high-fidelity amplification of target protein coding sequences and reducing template mutation risk | |
Template preparation | EnzymoPure™Extra-long DNA Polymerase | EnzymoPure™, free of DNA endonuclease and exonuclease, phosphatase, and RNase. | Used for amplification of long expression templates, composite regulatory elements, or long protein coding sequences | |
Template preparation | EnzymoPure™ HF DNA Polymerase (Blood-resistant) | EnzymoPure™, free of DNA endonuclease and exonuclease, phosphatase, and RNase. | Used for template amplification from complex sample sources or PCR systems with high inhibitor background | |
Nucleotide substrate | UltraPure dNTP Mix(10 mM each) | 5 ml | Used for PCR template amplification and supports linear DNA template and mutant template preparation | |
Nucleotide substrate | UltraPure dATP (100mM) | BioReagent, DNase, RNase free, PCR Reagent, endotoxin tested, UltraBio™, Suitable for molecular biology, sterile, for DNA and RNA applications, ≥99%, 100mM | Used for PCR template amplification, in vitro DNA synthesis, or individually prepared dNTP systems | |
Nucleotide substrate | UltraPure dCTP (100mM) | BioReagent, DNase, RNase free, PCR Reagent, endotoxin tested, UltraBio™, Suitable for molecular biology, sterile, for DNA and RNA applications, ≥99%, 100mM | Used for PCR template amplification, in vitro DNA synthesis, or individually prepared dNTP systems | |
Nucleotide substrate | UltraPure dGTP (100mM) | BioReagent, DNase, RNase free, PCR Reagent, endotoxin tested, UltraBio™, Suitable for molecular biology, sterile, for DNA and RNA applications, ≥99%, 100mM | Used for PCR template amplification, in vitro DNA synthesis, or individually prepared dNTP systems | |
Nucleotide substrate | UltraPure dTTP (100mM) | BioReagent, DNase, RNase free, PCR Reagent, endotoxin tested, UltraBio™, Suitable for molecular biology, sterile, for DNA and RNA applications, ≥99%, 100mM | Used for PCR template amplification, in vitro DNA synthesis, or individually prepared dNTP systems | |
In vitro transcription | T7 RNA Polymerase | BioReagent,endotoxin tested,Suitable for molecular biology,EnzymoPure™,RNase free,Recombinant,≥98.0%,50 U/μL | Used for T7 promoter-driven in vitro transcription and coupled transcription-translation CFPS reactions | |
In vitro transcription | T7 RNA Polymerase | ActiBioPure™, Carrier Free, Bioactive, EnzymoPure™, 1KU/μL | Used for high-concentration transcription systems, mRNA template preparation, and high-throughput CFPS template validation | |
RNA protection | RNase Inhibitor | pharmaceutical grade, PharmPure™, ≥95%, 1000U/μl | Used to protect mRNA templates and transcription products, reducing decreased translation efficiency caused by RNase contamination | |
RNA protection | RNase Inhibitor | pharmaceutical grade, PharmPure™, ≥95%, 40U/μl | Used in mRNA-template CFPS, in vitro transcription, and RNA sample handling for RNase inhibition | |
RNA protection | RNase Inhibitor (Murine, 40U/μL) | Recombinant, BioReagent, DNase, RNase free, Suitable for molecular biology, for DNA and RNA applications, ≥95%(SDS-PAGE), 40U/μl | Used for RNA-sensitive CFPS systems and mRNA template stability control | |
RNA protection | RNase Inhibitor(RNasin) | 40U/μl | Used for RNA protection in in vitro transcription, mRNA template preparation, and translation reactions | |
RNA-grade solvent | RNase-Free Water | 100 ml | Used to prepare CFPS reaction components, RNA templates, nucleotides, and buffers | |
Reaction buffer and dilution | PBS, DNase&RNase Free | sterile-filtered, BioReagent, DNase, RNase free, ready-to-use, for cell culture, 1× | Used for nucleic acid or protein sample dilution, pre- and post-reaction processing, and low-nuclease-background experiments | |
Reaction environment regulation | PEG8000 (50%, RNase free) | BioReagent, DNase, RNase free, Protease Free, ≥99%, 50% | Can be used for molecular crowding environments, RNA-related experiments, or CFPS condition optimization | |
Decontamination treatment | RNase and DNA Remover | 250ml | Used to remove RNase/DNA contamination from benches, tools, and reaction areas, reducing CFPS background interference | |
Transcription substrate/energy substrate | Adenosine 5ʹ-Triphosphate, Disodium Salt (ATP) | ≥98% | Used in transcription, translation, and energy cycling systems; a core nucleotide component of CFPS | |
Transcription substrate/energy substrate | Adenosine 5′-triphosphate disodium salt (ATP) | 10mM in Water | Used for small-volume reactions, system optimization, and directly added ATP supplementation | |
Transcription substrate | GTP Trisodium salt Solution | pharmaceutical grade, PharmPure™, ≥99%, 100mM | Used for mRNA transcription, translation elongation, and CFPS nucleotide substrate supplementation | |
Transcription substrate | GTP Trisodium salt Solution | pharmaceutical grade, PharmPure™, ≥99%, 10mM | Used for small-volume CFPS reactions, nucleotide supplementation, and transcription system optimization | |
Transcription substrate | Guanosine-5'-triphosphate disodium salt(5′-GTP-Na2) | ≥90% | Used in in vitro transcription, translation reactions, and GTP-related substrate systems | |
Transcription substrate | CTP Trisodium salt Solution | pharmaceutical grade, PharmPure™, ≥99%, 100mM | Used for RNA synthesis reactions and coupled transcription-translation systems | |
Transcription substrate | UTP Trisodium salt Solution | pharmaceutical grade, PharmPure™, ≥99%, 100mM | Used for RNA synthesis reactions and CFPS transcription substrate supplementation | |
Transcription substrate | Uridine 5′-triphosphate trisodium salt hydrate(UTP Na3) | Moligand™, ≥95% | Used for in vitro transcription reactions and mRNA template preparation | |
Modified RNA substrate | N1-Me-Pseudo UTP Trisodium solution | pharmaceutical grade, PharmPure™, ≥99%, 100mM | Used for modified RNA template preparation and experiments related to mRNA stability and translation efficiency | |
Modified RNA substrate | Pseudo UTP Trisodium solution | pharmaceutical grade, PharmPure™, ≥99%, 100mM | Used for pseudouridine-modified RNA preparation and mRNA template optimization | |
Energy regeneration | Phospho(enol)pyruvic acid monopotassium salt | 10mM in Water | Used in PEP-based energy supply systems, supporting ATP regeneration and short-duration efficient protein synthesis | |
Energy regeneration | Phospho(enol)pyruvic acid monopotassium salt | ≥97% | Used for CFPS energy regeneration system construction and reaction duration optimization | |
Energy regeneration | Creatine Phosphokinase | EnzymoPure™, Native, ≥300 U/mg protein | Used as the ATP regeneration enzyme component in creatine phosphate energy systems | |
Energy regeneration | Creatine Phosphokinase | EnzymoPure™, Native, >30 U/mg protein | Used for method validation in creatine phosphate/creatine kinase energy regeneration systems | |
Labeled amino acid substrate | Cell Free Amino Acid Mixture-¹³C, ¹⁵N, D | ≥97 atom% D,≥98 atom% 13C,≥98 atom% 15N, 2-100mM in water | Used for isotope-labeled protein synthesis in CFPS, structural studies, and mass spectrometry analysis | |
Labeled amino acid substrate | Cell Free Amino Acid Mixture-¹⁵N | ≥98 atom% 15N, 5-100mM in water | Used for ¹⁵N-labeled protein expression, NMR, or proteomics analysis | |
RNA/nucleic acid electrophoresis | BPTE Running B uffer (10×, RNase Free) | BioReagent,Suitable for molecular biology,RNase free,for NA electrophoresis,10× | Used for quality analysis of mRNA templates, in vitro transcription products, or nucleic acid templates | |
RNA/nucleic acid electrophoresis | TBE Buffer (5×, RNase Free) | BioReagent,Suitable for molecular biology,RNase free,for NA electrophoresis,5× | Used for electrophoretic detection of DNA templates, PCR products, and RNA samples | |
RNA/nucleic acid electrophoresis | TAE Buffer (50×, RNase Free) | BioReagent,Suitable for molecular biology,for NA electrophoresis,RNase free,50× | Used for CFPS template quality control and nucleic acid integrity detection | |
RNA hybridization/nucleic acid analysis | SSC Buffer (20×, pH 7.0, RNase Free) | BioReagent,Suitable for molecular biology,RNase free,sterile,for DNA and RNA applications,20× | Used as a low-RNase-background buffer system in RNA or DNA analysis workflows | |
Nucleic acid analysis buffer | SSPE | 20X, pH7.4 | Used for nucleic acid analysis, hybridization, or low-degradation-background sample processing |
7 Frequently Asked Questions
7.1 Is a cell-free protein synthesis system suitable for replacing all cell-based expression systems?
No. CFPS is suitable for rapid expression, difficult-to-express protein screening, toxic proteins, membrane proteins, unnatural amino acid incorporation, and synthetic biology prototype validation. If the goal is low-cost large-scale production, complex post-translational modification, or stable secretory expression, the cost and functional advantages of cell-based expression systems and CFPS should still be compared according to protein type.
7.2 How should DNA templates and mRNA templates be selected?
DNA templates are suitable for coupled transcription-translation reactions, are easy to handle, and are commonly used in E. coli lysate and PURE systems. mRNA templates are suitable for directly studying translation efficiency and eukaryotic translation regulation, but they are more sensitive to RNA integrity and RNase contamination. PCR templates can be prioritized for high-throughput screening, while plasmid templates can be prioritized for yield optimization.
7.3 Can PCR products be used directly in CFPS reactions?
Yes, but the promoter, translation initiation element, and termination structure must be complete, and inhibition caused by PCR residues must be controlled. Linear PCR templates are susceptible to nuclease degradation. If necessary, protective sequences should be added, template purity should be improved, or a system more suitable for linear templates should be selected.
7.4 Why are liposomes or nanodiscs needed when expressing membrane proteins by CFPS?
Membrane proteins contain hydrophobic transmembrane regions and are prone to aggregation or misfolding in aqueous systems. Liposomes, nanodiscs, detergents, or microsomal membranes can provide a membrane-mimicking environment, increasing the likelihood of membrane protein insertion, stabilization, and functional detection.
7.5 Why are disulfide bond-containing proteins often inactive in CFPS?
Disulfide bond formation requires a suitable redox environment and folding auxiliary factors. If the lysate is strongly reducing or lacks folding enzymes such as DsbC and PDI, the protein may be expressed but fail to adopt the correct conformation. Such proteins should be evaluated for both expression level and functional activity.
7.6 Why is CFPS suitable for unnatural amino acid incorporation?
CFPS is open and controllable, making it convenient to add unnatural amino acids, orthogonal tRNAs, and aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases, while also allowing adjustment of concentration and reaction conditions. Compared with cell-based systems, in vitro systems more readily avoid problems related to unnatural amino acid uptake, toxicity, and metabolic interference.
The value of cell-free protein synthesis systems lies in separating transcription, translation, and protein functional verification from the constraints of cell growth. For toxic proteins, membrane proteins, complex folded proteins, unnatural amino acid-containing proteins, and high-throughput screening tasks, CFPS can significantly shorten the design-expression-detection cycle.
