Making Sense of Rhodium Catalysis: Three Core Engines—Rh(I), Rh(II), and Cp*Rh(III)—plus a Quick Selection Guide to Representative Product Tables A–G
Making Sense of Rhodium Catalysis: Three Core Engines—Rh(I), Rh(II), and Cp*Rh(III)—plus a Quick Selection Guide to Representative Product Tables A–G
You often see the words “Rh catalysis” in the literature, but in the lab it usually refers to a whole variable system: the rhodium input form (salt/oxide/supported material/complex), counteranions and ligands, solvent, and additives together determine what the true active species is in the reaction. That, in turn, explains why activity and selectivity can “jump” when you change what looks like a minor detail.
This article uses a practical framework—Rh source → precatalyst → active species—to make rhodium catalysis intuitive and actionable. The companion Tables A–G at the end help you start from the task and quickly locate: which “engine” to choose, which table to begin with, and which variables are most likely to cause run-to-run drift.
What does “rhodium catalyst” actually mean?
Why can the same element (Rh) behave so differently when you change the precursor/anion/ligand? Start by separating three concepts:
- Rhodium source (Rh source): the starting material that supplies rhodium, such as RhCl₃·xH₂O, rhodium nitrate, Rh(acac)₃, Rh₂O₃, rhodium black, Rh/C, Rh/Al₂O₃, etc. These are not necessarily the real “active species” in the reaction, but they constrain which activation pathways are accessible later.
- Precatalyst: a well-defined, weighable, storable convertible form that becomes the active species under the reaction conditions. Examples include [RhCl(COD)]₂, [Rh(COD)₂]BF₄, [Cp*RhCl₂]₂, Rh₂(OAc)₄, and so on.
- Active species: the transient species that actually performs key steps during catalysis (e.g., H₂ activation, insertion, reductive elimination, carbene transfer, C–H metalation). In solution it may exist as a dynamic equilibrium of multiple forms, strongly influenced by ligands, anions, solvent, and trace impurities.
Note: These are functional roles, not strict chemical categories; the same reagent can play different roles in different systems.
Why rhodium is often seen as “expensive but worth it”: four classic strengths
Rhodium catalysis is repeatedly used in organic synthesis and in materials/process chemistry mainly because it excels at four things:
- High selectivity and mild conditions in homogeneous hydrogenation/addition: Rh systems exemplified by Wilkinson’s catalyst are milestones in the history of homogeneous hydrogenation. Early work already demonstrated pathways where Rh complexes participate in hydrogenation via metal–hydride intermediates.
- Industrial impact of asymmetric hydrogenation: Work exemplified by Knowles established chiral Rh-catalyzed asymmetric hydrogenation as a major pillar of modern enantioselective synthesis.
- Two modern “engines”: Rh(II) carbene transfer + Rh(III) C–H activation: Dirhodium “paddlewheel” catalysts are highly efficient and classic in carbene chemistry, while Cp*Rh(III) occupies a central position in directed C–H functionalization.
- Hydroformylation/carbonylation (syngas: CO/H₂) as an industrial backbone: Under CO/H₂, Rh(I) readily enters working states such as Rh–H / Rh–CO, enabling olefin hydroformylation (to aldehydes) and related carbonylation reactions under relatively mild conditions. Importantly, linear/branched selectivity (n/iso), rate, and side reactions can often be engineered by tuning phosphine/phosphite ligand electronics and sterics and by adjusting CO partial pressure—making this a mature large-scale Rh platform.
The three most common “rhodium active centers”: Rh(I) / Rh(II) / Rh(III)
Engine (common oxidation state) | “Tags” you often see in product names | Typical precatalysts/precursors (examples) | Common activation modes | Signature reactions / capability boundaries | Selection tips |
Rh(I) (the main homogeneous workhorse; often enters Rh(I)/Rh(III) cycles) | COD, NBD, MeCN, PPh₃; also BF₄⁻/PF₆⁻/OTf⁻/SbF₆⁻/BArF₄⁻ (often in cationic systems) | Chloride-bridged dimers such as [RhCl(COD)]₂; cationic [Rh(diene)₂]⁺X⁻; classic platforms such as RhCl(PPh₃)₃ | Ligand exchange / creation of coordination vacancies; cationic systems are more strongly affected by ion pairing, anion weak-coordination, and solubility | Hydrogenation, additions, isomerization, (some) carbonyl-related platforms; asymmetric hydrogenation often uses chiral bisphosphine–Rh(I) | For rapid screening: start from general Rh(I) precursors and build a ligand library (Table B). For ee: go directly to pre-formed chiral Rh(I) catalysts (Table C). |
Rh(II) dirhodium (paddlewheel) | “Dirhodium(II)”, “Rh₂(OOCR)₄”, “paddlewheel”; various carboxylate/ chiral ligand names | Rh₂(OAc)₄, Rh₂(TFA)₄, chiral Rh₂(DOSP)₄, BTPCP, PTAD, etc. | Reaction with carbene precursors to form metal–carbene; axial sites/additives/solvent may also modulate | Cyclopropanation, C–H insertion, X–H insertion (carbene transfer); chiral dirhodium controls enantioselectivity | First make it work: achiral dirhodium (Table D). For ee: chiral dirhodium (Table E). |
Rh(III) (especially Cp*Rh(III)) | CpRh, [CpRhCl₂]₂; often described together with “silver salt / halide abstraction” conditions | [Cp*RhCl₂]₂; halide-free or weakly coordinating anion CpRh(III) precursors | Commonly: halide abstraction → more reactive Rh(III) (silver salts are common, but silver-free routes exist) | Directed C–H activation/cyclization/coupling; sensitive to additive package and substrate directing groups | For C–H activation, start with Table F. If you need “cleaner activation,” compare with halide-free/weakly coordinating precursors. |
Homogeneous vs heterogeneous: selection is not only about separation, but also “site controllability + process pathway”
Dimension | Homogeneous Rh catalysis | Heterogeneous/supported Rh catalysis (Rh/C, Rh/Al₂O₃, rhodium black, etc.) | Practical, actionable tip |
What is the active site? | Molecular, often structurally definable Rh complexes/intermediates; sites are more “describable” | Surface atoms/edges/defects/metal–support interfaces; sites may change dynamically; identification and counting are harder | For mechanistic clarity and predictable optimization: homogeneous is usually easier; heterogeneous relies more on experience plus characterization/controls |
What can be tuned (selectivity tools)? | Fine control via ligand electronics/sterics/chirality—especially good for ee and site selectivity | Mainly via support, dispersion, particle size, metal–support interactions, additives, and conditions; fewer “chiral tools” (unless special strategies) | If you need ee/high stereoselectivity → prioritize homogeneous |
Activity/selectivity (typical trend) | Often easier to reach both high activity and high selectivity; more predictable | Selectivity may be influenced by support and mass transfer; modern heterogeneous systems can also be very strong (not inherently worse) | — |
Separation/recycling/continuous operation | Separation is often harder; recycling may require extraction, immobilization, biphasic systems, membranes, etc. | Filtration/fixed beds are natural; often better for scale-up and continuous production | If the goal is scale-up, recycling, continuous processing: heterogeneous often has an edge |
Sensitivity to impurities/handling | Often more sensitive to water/oxygen/halides/strongly coordinating impurities; reproducibility depends on operational discipline | Also sensitive to some impurities, but problems often stem from mass transfer, bed/stirring, deactivation (sintering/poisoning) | For homogeneous: lock down “cleanliness/order/ligands.” For heterogeneous: lock down “stirring/H₂ pressure/filtration/reuse.” |
Key reminders | Control metal residues; workup losses; active species may not match the input structure (confirm by controls) | Leaching/redeposition can make a system “look heterogeneous” while homogeneous species participates; sites are hard to define | Do a “hot filtration test” (does it keep reacting after filtration?) and measure metal residues (e.g., ICP) |
From precatalyst → active species: common activation pathways in Rh catalysis
Activation pathway | Common precursors / “name clues” | What typically happens | Most sensitive variables (often cause “jumps”) |
A. Ligand dissociation / dimer cleavage → coordination vacancy | Rh(I)–COD/NBD/MeCN/PPh₃; chloride-bridged dimers such as [Rh(μ-Cl)(COD)]₂; cationic [Rh(COD)₂]BF₄ | “Occupying ligands stabilize first, then vacate under reaction conditions”; dimers are split into mononuclear species that can enter the catalytic cycle | Ligand addition order and equivalents; solvent donor strength; presence of halides/strongly coordinating impurities |
B. Halide abstraction/activation (common in Rh(III) C–H) | [Cp*RhCl₂]₂ + AgX / AgOAc etc. | “Remove Cl⁻ to make Rh more ‘open’ and reactive,” facilitating species that can undergo C–H metalation (note: Ag salts can do more than just halide abstraction) | Ag salt identity and loading; anion (SbF₆⁻/BF₄⁻/OTf⁻, etc.); presence of acetate/base (affects CMD) |
C. Formation of key intermediates (Rh–H / Rh–carbene / Rh–metalated) | Hydrogenation: Rh(I) precursors; carbene: Rh₂(OOCR)₄; C–H: Cp*Rh(III) | Hydrogenation: Rh(I) oxidative addition → Rh(III) dihydride, then insertion and reductive elimination; carbene: Rh–carbene generation and transfer (often from diazo compounds); C–H: Rh–C bond formation (CMD, etc.) | Dryness/inert atmosphere; additives (base/acid/halide scavengers); substrate coordination interference |
D. Redox / reductive activation (often overlooked but critical) | Rh(III) salts or higher-oxidation precursors; in some cases metal Rh(0)/nanoparticles form | First “reduce into a catalytically competent state” (Rh(I) or Rh–H); reductants may come from H₂, phosphines, substrate, or additives | Whether a reductant exists; induction period; impurities (O₂/H₂O/halides) |
Reading product names: quickly tell “which engine it is” and “what it’s for”
When you see in the name… | Usually which “engine/family” | Go to which table first | Use-case hint |
COD / NBD / MeCN / PPh₃ (especially with Rh(I)) | Mostly Rh(I) homogeneous precursors/platforms | Table B (general Rh(I)) / Table C (chiral Rh(I)) | “Stabilize first, then activate/ligand exchange”; good for library screening and literature benchmarking |
Rh₂(… )₄ / dirhodium(II) / paddlewheel | Rh(II) dirhodium (carbene transfer) | Table D (achiral) / Table E (chiral) | Cyclopropanation, C–H/X–H insertion; for ee, go straight to chiral dirhodium |
CpRh / [CpRhCl₂]₂ | Typical Rh(III) C–H activation platform | Table F | Directed C–H activation/cyclization/coupling; often paired with halide abstraction/activation additives |
Rh/C, Rh/Al₂O₃, rhodium black, Rh powder | Heterogeneous/material-side Rh | Table A | Easier separation/recycling and scale-up; watch mass transfer, support/dispersion, and reproducibility |
The three most common “sensitivity points” in Rh catalysis
Sensitivity point | What it usually causes | Common symptoms | Quick response |
Trace water/oxygen | Affects activation, changes oxidation state/intermediate equilibria → induction periods and reproducibility drift | “Sometimes fast, sometimes dead” under nominally identical conditions; large day-to-day differences with the same catalyst batch | Dry solvents/glassware; inert atmosphere; standardize addition order and pre-activation time |
Halides/strongly coordinating impurities (Cl⁻/Br⁻; strongly coordinating S/N compounds, etc.) | Can passivate cationic Rh(I) or alter Rh(III) activation pathways | Reaction “suppressed,” clear activity drop; suddenly improves after adding Ag salt or switching anion | Control halide sources; run halide scavenging/abstraction controls when needed; avoid strongly coordinating impurities |
Ion pairing & solubility (anion effects) | Changes how “naked” a cationic Rh(I) is, ion-pair tightness, and solubility → rate/selectivity shifts | Results “jump” when switching BF₄⁻/OTf⁻/SbF₆⁻/BArF₄⁻ | Treat the anion as a tunable knob; run a small matrix (anion × solvent × ligand) and record solubility/turbidity |
Notes:
- 5For heterogeneous systems, additionally watch mass transfer/stirring/H₂ pressure and catalyst wetting/dispersion; otherwise what looks like a catalyst issue is often a mass-transfer issue.
- Strongly coordinating sulfur/amine species and the site-blocking effect of CO: many Rh(I) systems are easily “captured” and passivated by such ligands—especially when using more “naked” cationic Rh(I). This often looks like catalyst failure, but is actually coordination inhibition.
Aladdin Rhodium Catalyst R&D Selection & Application Navigation: Representative Product Subtables (Tables A–G; Rh sources / homogeneous Rh(I) / chiral Rh(I) / Rh₂(II) / Cp*Rh(III) / clusters)
Navigation for Rhodium Catalyst Product Tables
Your goal/task | Start with which table | What this table mainly contains | Typical use scenarios | Quick in-table screening keywords |
Need a metal Rh source/salt/solution, or want to make supported catalysts/electroplating/material precursors | Table A | Rh(III) inorganic salts/solutions, Rh oxides, supported Rh/C, etc. | Preparing supported Rh catalysts (impregnation → reduction), making Rh solutions, materials/electrochemistry/surface treatment, process-scale “feedstock side” | “rhodium nitrate / rhodium chloride / rhodium bromide / rhodium sulfate solution / rhodium oxide / Rh on carbon” |
Want to quickly build a general homogeneous Rh(I) system and screen ligands yourself | Table B (precursor section) | Rh(I) precursors with exchangeable ligands (COD/NBD/olefin/acac/MeCN, etc.), cationic [Rh(diene)₂]⁺ | Homogeneous hydrogenation/isomerization/addition/coupling: precursor + candidate ligand library for fast condition scouting | “(COD)₂Rh⁺, NBD, acac, MeCN, chloride-bridged dimer, BF4/OTf/PF6/SbF6/BArF4” |
Don’t want to formulate ligands yourself; want plug-and-play Rh(I) platforms for quick validation/benchmarking | Table B (mature platforms section) | Pre-ligated platforms with PPh₃/CO/H etc. (Wilkinson-type, Rh–H, Rh–CO, etc.) | Literature benchmarking, teaching demos, quick “can this route run?”, mechanistic controls (Rh–H/Rh–CO) | “PPh₃, Wilkinson, hydride, carbonyl, Rh–CO, Rh–H” |
Need asymmetric hydrogenation/asymmetric addition with ready-made chiral Rh(I) catalysts | Table C | Pre-formed chiral Rh(I) catalysts based on commercial chiral ligands (DUPHOS, BPE, NORPHOS, BINAP, phane, ferrocene, etc.) | ee is the goal: start from mature chiral families, then fine-tune ligand family, anion (BF4/OTf, etc.), solvent, additives | “DUPHOS, BPE, NORPHOS, BINAP, phane, ferrocene, catASium, BF4/OTf” |
Doing carbene transfer (cyclopropanation, C–H insertion, X–H insertion) without emphasizing chirality | Table D | Achiral Rh(II) dirhodium with varied carboxylate/ligand environments (OAc, TFA, perfluorocarboxylates, bulky carboxylates, lactamates, etc.) | First make the reaction work; tune activity/selectivity/solubility by changing carboxylate environment | “Rh2, dirhodium, acetate/TFA/pivalate/perfluoro, caprolactamate” |
Doing enantioselective carbene transfer (ee-focused cyclopropanation/insertion) | Table E | Chiral Rh(II) dirhodium (DOSP, BTPCP, PTAD, amino-acid-derived families, etc.) | ee is the core metric: start from mature chiral dirhodium families, then match substrates and fine-tune conditions | “Rh2(DOSP), BTPCP, PTAD, Leu/Phe-derived, HPLC grade” |
Doing C–H activation / directed cyclization / coupling (Cp*Rh(III) systems) or cyclometalated Rh(III) chemistry | Table F | CpRh(III)Cl₂ dimer, halide-free cationic CpRh(III), cyclometalated Rh(III) dimers, etc. | Reproducing Cp*Rh(III) literature systems; comparing “cleaner activation” using halide-free/weakly coordinating anion precursors | “Cp*Rh, pentamethylcyclopentadienyl, SbF6, cyclometalated (2-phenylpyridine)” |
Doing mechanistic/clusters/CO chemistry, or want cluster precursors | Table G | Rh carbonyl clusters, hydride clusters, etc. (more mechanism/model oriented) | Mechanistic models, cluster/nanoparticle precursor exploration, CO coordination and cluster chemistry | “Rh4(CO)12, Rh6(CO)16, μ-hydride cluster” |
Table A | Engineering/Materials-Facing Rh Sources (Rh(III) Salts/Solutions/Oxides + Supported Catalysts)
Category | Aladdin Cat. No. | Product name | CAS No. | Spec./Purity | Key features / typical uses |
Rh(III) nitrate (hydrated) precursor | Rhodium(III) nitrate hydrate | 10139-58-9 | ~36% Rh | Aqueous Rh(III) metal source; commonly used to prepare Rh salt solutions, synthesize complexes, or impregnate supports to make supported Rh catalysts | |
Rh(III) nitrate (assay specified) | T1373807 | Same as above (adduct; N content specified) | 154090-43-4 | Elemental analysis: N 3.30–4.50% | Suitable when “batch-consistent / assay-specified” charging is required for controlled dosing and comparative studies |
Supported Rh/C (heterogeneous) | Rhodium on activated carbon | — | Water-wet; 5% Rh (on dry basis) | Classic heterogeneous hydrogenation/reduction catalyst; water-wet form improves handling safety and weighing/transfer | |
Supported Rh/C (heterogeneous, with stabilizer) | Rhodium on carbon catalyst | 7440-16-6 | 5% Rh; contains 55–60% water stabilizer | Widely used for heterogeneous hydrogenation/reduction; water stabilizer improves storage/handling safety and is helpful for scale-up evaluation | |
Metallic Rh (powder/black) for heterogeneous catalysis/materials | Rhodium black | 7440-16-6 | ≥99.9% metals basis | High-surface-area metallic Rh; often used for heterogeneous hydrogenation/reduction, materials/electrochemical benchmarks, and as a metal source for preparing supported Rh | |
Supported Rh/Al₂O₃ (heterogeneous) | Rhodium on alumina | 7440-16-6 | 5 wt.% loading labeling, matrix alumina support | Classic supported catalyst (Rh/Al₂O₃) for hydrogenation/hydrogenation under gas-phase or scale-up conditions; support affects dispersion and selectivity (useful comparison to Rh/C) | |
Rh(III) chloride (hydrated) precursor | Rhodium(III) chloride hydrate | 20765-98-4 | Rh 38.5–42.5% | Classic Rh(III) metal source for Rh complex synthesis, catalyst precursors, and supported Rh preparation | |
Rh(III) chloride (trihydrate) precursor | Rhodium(III) chloride trihydrate | 13569-65-8 | ≥98% | RhCl₃·xH₂O-type precursor; suitable for routine Rh complex synthesis and catalyst system setup | |
Rh(III) chloride (anhydrous/low-water) precursor | Rhodium chloride | 10049-07-7 | ≥98% | RhCl₃-type metal source; more compatible with moisture-sensitive systems; often used for complex synthesis and for making Rh⁰ by supported/reductive routes | |
Rh(III) bromide (hydrated) precursor | Rhodium(III) bromide hydrate | 123333-87-9 | Rh 23.6% | Rh(III) halide source; useful for halide-effect controls or specific Rh(III) complex synthesis | |
Rh(III) bromide (dihydrate) precursor | Rhodium(III) bromide dihydrate | 15608-29-4 | ≥97% | Rh(III) bromide source; commonly used for Rh complex/precatalyst preparation and condition benchmarking | |
Rh(III) iodide precursor | Rhodium(III) iodide | 15492-38-3 | Rh 21.3% | Rh(III) iodide metal source; suitable for halide exchange and coordination-strength comparison studies | |
Rh oxide / materials precursor | Rhodium(III) oxide pentahydrate | 39373-27-8 | ≥99.95% metals basis | High-purity hydrated Rh(III) oxide precursor; used for demanding coordination/material precursor work and catalytic controls | |
Rh(III) nitrate (dihydrate) precursor | Rhodium(III) nitrate dihydrate | 13465-43-5 | ≥95% | Rh(III) nitrate metal source for solution preparation and impregnation–reduction routes to Rh/C or Rh/oxide supports | |
Rh(III) sulfate solution precursor | Rhodium sulfate solution | 10489-46-0 | ≥99.95% metals basis | Aqueous Rh solution metal source; commonly used for electroplating/surface treatment or impregnation-based preparation of supported Rh | |
Rh(III) carboxylate precursor | Rhodium(III) acetate | 42204-14-8 | Rh ≥38% | Rh(III) carboxylate metal source; used for complex synthesis and selected homogeneous catalyst-precursor routes | |
Rh(III) β-diketonate complex (high purity) | Rhodium(III) acetylacetonate (Rh(acac)₃) | 14284-92-5 | PrimorTrace™, ≥99.99% metals basis | High-purity Rh(acac)₃; common in coordination/material precursor studies and catalytic benchmarks | |
Rh oxide (materials/heterogeneous precursor) | Anhydrous rhodium oxide | 12036-35-0 | ≥99.8% metals basis, Rh ≥80.6% | Used in materials/electrochemistry/heterogeneous studies; can also serve as a precursor for reduction to Rh⁰ or supported Rh preparation |
Table B | General Homogeneous Rh(I) (Mostly Achiral): Ligand-Exchangeable Precursors + Mature PPh₃/CO/H Platforms
Category | Aladdin Cat. No. | Product name | CAS No. | Spec./Purity | Key features / typical uses |
Rh(I) chloro-bridged COD dimer precursor | Chloro(1,5-cyclooctadiene)rhodium(I) dimer | 12092-47-6 | Rh 41.7% | One of the most commonly used Rh(I) starting materials; readily undergoes ligand exchange / halide abstraction to generate active Rh(I) species (hydrogenation/addition/isomerization, etc.) | |
Rh(I) chloro-bridged NBD dimer precursor | Chloro(norbornadiene)rhodium dimer | 12257-42-0 | ≥99.95% metals basis | “Workhorse” precursor similar to COD; NBD is easily displaced—useful for rapid construction of ligated Rh(I) catalysts | |
Rh(I) chloro-bridged olefin dimer precursor | (Bicyclooctene)chloro-rhodium dimer | 12279-09-3 | ≥98% | Olefin ligand is exchangeable; used to rapidly generate ligated Rh(I) catalysts and screen conditions | |
Rh(I) chloro-bridged diene dimer precursor | Chloro(1,5-hexadiene)rhodium(I) dimer | 32965-49-4 | ≥98% | More “readily activatable” olefin precursor; often used in ligand screening and mechanistic benchmarking | |
Rh(I) chloro-bridged vinyl dimer precursor | Chloro-di(vinyl)rhodium(I) dimer | 12081-16-2 | ≥98% | Vinyl/olefin-type precursor; used to build Rh(I) active centers via ligand exchange or for related mechanistic studies | |
Rh(I) COD–acac neutral precursor | (1,5-Cyclooctadiene)(2,4-pentanedionato)rhodium(I) | 12245-39-5 | ≥99.95% metals basis | Neutral and soluble; suitable for ligand substitution and building a homogeneous Rh(I) library (screening reaction window/solvent/additives) | |
Rh(I) NBD–acac neutral precursor | (Norbornadiene)(acetylacetonato)rhodium | 32354-50-0 | ≥97% | Neutral Rh(I) precursor; commonly used for rapid installation of phosphine/N ligands to build catalytic systems | |
Rh(I) olefin–acac neutral precursor | Acetylacetonato bis(cyclooctene)rhodium(I) | 34767-55-0 | ≥97% | Neutral; olefin is readily exchangeable—useful for ligand screening and generating active Rh(I) species | |
Rh(I) acac–olefin neutral precursor | Acetylacetonato bis(ethylene)rhodium(I) | 12082-47-2 | ≥95% | Neutral Rh(I) platform; used to construct ligated Rh(I) catalysts and for mechanistic comparisons | |
Rh(I) COD–(8-quinolinato) chelate | (1,5-Cyclooctadiene)(8-quinolinolato)rhodium(I) | 33409-86-8 | ≥97% | Neutral N,O-chelated Rh(I); suitable for coordination/activation-pathway studies and as a precursor in specific systems | |
Rh(I) alkoxy–COD dimer | Methoxy(1,5-cyclooctadiene)rhodium(I) dimer | 12148-72-0 | ≥98% | Rh–OMe reactive precursor; useful for building Rh(I) systems under halide-free/low-salt conditions or as a base-related control | |
Rh(I) hydroxy–COD dimer | Hydroxy(1,5-cyclooctadiene)rhodium(I) dimer | 73468-85-6 | ≥95% | Rh–OH reactive precursor; facilitates generation of ligated Rh(I) active centers; useful for activation/mechanistic controls | |
Rh(I) cation “stabilized adduct” | (1,5-Cyclooctadiene)(hydroquinone)rhodium(I) tetrafluoroborate | 120967-70-6 | ≥95% | Stabilized source of cationic Rh(I); safer/more reliable for weighing and storage, releases active Rh(I) in situ | |
Rh(I) cation [Rh(COD)₂]⁺ (BF₄⁻) | Bis(1,5-cyclooctadiene)rhodium tetrafluoroborate | 35138-22-8 | Rh 24.8% | Common cationic precursor; convenient for introducing ligands (including chiral ligands) to build homogeneous catalysts | |
Rh(I) cation [Rh(COD)₂]⁺ (OTf⁻) | Bis(1,5-cyclooctadiene)rhodium triflate | 99326-34-8 | ≥99.95% metals basis | Weakly coordinating anion often promotes activation; used to build high-activity Rh(I) systems and for rapid ligand exchange | |
Rh(I) cation [Rh(NBD)₂]⁺ (BF₄⁻) | Bis(norbornadiene)rhodium(I) tetrafluoroborate | 36620-11-8 | ≥99.95% metals basis | NBD dissociates/is replaced readily; suitable for fast generation of active Rh(I) centers (hydrogenation/addition, etc.) | |
Rh(I) cation [Rh(COD)₂]⁺ (hydrated BF₄⁻) | Bis(1,5-cyclooctadiene)rhodium(I) tetrafluoroborate hydrate | 207124-65-0 | ≥97% | Hydrated form as listed; still a common cationic precursor for ligand introduction and condition screening | |
Rh(I) cation [Rh(COD)₂]⁺ (PF₆⁻) | Bis(1,5-cyclooctadiene)rhodium hexafluorophosphate | 62793-31-1 | ≥98% | Common cationic precursor; PF₆⁻ can help with solubility/ion-pairing controls—useful for achiral and asymmetric library building | |
Rh(I) MeCN “activated-site” precursor (BF₄⁻) | Di(acetonitrile)(1,5-cyclooctadiene)rhodium(I) tetrafluoroborate | 32679-02-0 | ≥98% | MeCN is labile → easier activation; suitable for quickly generating ligated Rh(I) active centers | |
Rh(I) cation [Rh(COD)₂]⁺ (SbF₆⁻) | B468674 | Bis(1,5-cyclooctadiene)rhodium(I) hexafluoroantimonate | 130296-28-5 | ≥97% | Extremely weakly coordinating anion; often chosen for highly active cationic Rh(I) systems (“cleaner” activation) |
Rh(I) cation [Rh(NBD)₂]⁺ (OTf⁻) | Bis(norbornadiene)rhodium(I) triflate | 178397-71-2 | ≥97% | OTf⁻ is weakly coordinating; helps form more reactive Rh(I) centers—good for ligand exchange/activity benchmarking | |
Rh(I) MeCN/COD mixed cation (BF₄⁻) | Bis(acetonitrile)(1,5-cyclooctadiene)rhodium(I) tetrafluoroborate | 46360-78-5 | ≥97% | Combines COD stabilization with MeCN lability; suitable for “quick-start” homogeneous screening | |
Rh(I) ultra-weakly coordinating anion (BArF₄⁻) | Bis(1,5-cyclooctadiene)rhodium(I) tetrakis[bis(3,5-trifluoromethyl)phenyl]borate | 404573-66-6 | — | BArF₄⁻ is extremely weakly coordinating; used to access highly “naked” cationic Rh(I) for high-activity exploration | |
Rh(I) PPh₃ platform (Wilkinson-type) | Rhodium(I) chloride tris(triphenylphosphine) (NSC 124140) | 14694-95-2 | ≥99.95% metals basis | Classic homogeneous hydrogenation platform; well-defined ligation, good reproducibility—useful for teaching/screening/benchmarking | |
Rh(I) PPh₃ platform (halide variant) | Rhodium(I) bromide tris(triphenylphosphine) | 14973-89-8 | ≥99.95% metals basis | Same family as the chloride; used for halide-effect/activation comparisons and condition optimization | |
Rh(I) hydride (PPh₃) | Tetrakis(triphenylphosphine)rhodium(I) hydride | 18284-36-1 | Rh 8.4% min | Common precursor for homogeneous hydrogenation; relates directly to Rh–H active forms—useful for hydrogenation/isomerization, etc. | |
Rh(I) carbonyl hydride (PPh₃) | Carbonylhydridotris(triphenylphosphine)rhodium(I) | 17185-29-4 | ≥97% | Rh–H/CO platform; often used for hydroformylation/carbonylation-related mechanistic and catalytic benchmarking | |
Rh(I) carbonyl chloride (PPh₃) | Chlorocarbonylbis(triphenylphosphine)rhodium(I) | 13938-94-8 | Rh ≥14.90% | Rh–CO platform; suitable for carbonylation, ligand exchange, and mechanistic controls | |
Rh(I) carbonyl–β-diketonate–PPh₃ platform | Carbonylacetylacetonato(triphenylphosphine)rhodium(I) | 25470-96-6 | Rh 21% | Contains CO/β-diketonate/PPh₃ simultaneously; used for carbonylation-related screening and ligand-exchange routes | |
Rh(I) dicarbonyl–β-diketonate platform | Dicarbonyl(acetylacetonato)rhodium | 14874-82-9 | ≥99.95% metals basis | (CO)₂ platform that readily undergoes ligand substitution; useful as a carbonylation/activation precursor and benchmark | |
Rh(I) carbonyl chloro-bridged dimer | Di-μ-chloro-tetracarbonyldirhodium | 14523-22-9 | ≥97% | Rh–CO/Cl-bridged platform; used for carbonylation mechanism studies or to build Rh–CO active species | |
Rh(I) special “scorpionate” ligand platform (Tp type) | [Hydridotris(3,5-dimethyl-1H-pyrazolyl)borato]bis(triphenylphosphine)rhodium(I) toluene adduct | 341483-76-9 | ≥99% | Tp-type platform stabilizes Rh(I); used for small-molecule activation, mechanism, and coordination-chemistry benchmarking | |
Rh(I) bisphosphine cationic platform (dppb type) | Rhodium(I) 1,4-bis(diphenylphosphino)butane tetrafluoroborate (contains CH₂Cl₂) | 79255-71-3 | ≥98% | General bisphosphine–Rh(I) platform for homogeneous hydrogenation/addition/isomerization system setup | |
Rh(I) NBD + bisphosphine platform | (Bicyclo[2.2.1]hepta-2,5-diene)[1,4-bis(diphenylphosphino)butane]rhodium(I) tetrafluoroborate | 82499-43-2 | ≥95% | NBD is easily replaced; suitable for quickly generating bisphosphine–Rh(I) active centers and benchmarking conditions | |
Rh(I) ferrocene bisphosphine platform | 1,1′-Bis(diisopropylphosphino)ferrocene (1,5-cyclooctadiene)rhodium(I) | 157772-65-1 | ≥98% | Ferrocene-based bisphosphine–Rh(I) platform; used for ligand-effect studies and building homogeneous catalytic systems | |
Rh(I) specialty phosphine/aminophosphine platform | 3-Diisopropylphosphino-2-(N,N-dimethylamino)-1H-indene (1,5-cyclooctadiene)rhodium(I) | 540492-55-5 | ≥95% | Specialty tunable electronic/steric ligand–Rh(I); useful for “difficult substrate” screening and activation-pathway exploration | |
Polymer-supported Rh(I) (recyclable) | Triphenylphosphine(norbornadiene)rhodium(I) tetrafluoroborate, polymer-bound Fibre-cat® | 305367-01-5 | — | Facilitates separation/recycling and reuse; suitable for scale-up/flow chemistry or for lowering metal residues |
Table C | Chiral Rh(I) (Asymmetric Hydrogenation/Additions, etc.): Pre-formed Chiral Ligand–Rh(I) Platforms
Category | Aladdin Cat. No. | Product name | CAS No. | Spec./Purity | Key features / typical uses |
Chiral Rh(I)–DUPHOS (BF₄⁻) | (R,R)-i-Pr-DUPHOS-Rh(COD)BF₄ | 569650-64-2 | ≥98% | Pre-formed chiral bisphosphine–Rh(I); commonly used for asymmetric hydrogenation (fast to deploy; convenient for substrate screening) | |
Chiral Rh(I)–DUPHOS (BF₄⁻) | (S,S)-i-Pr-DUPHOS-Rh(COD)BF₄ | — | ≥98% | Enantiomer of i-Pr-DUPHOS version; used for ee benchmarking and condition optimization | |
Chiral Rh(I)–DUPHOS (OTf⁻) | (R,R)-Et-DUPHOS-Rh(COD)OTf | 136705-77-6 | ≥98% | OTf⁻ is weakly coordinating and often favors activation; used for asymmetric hydrogenation/addition screening | |
Chiral Rh(I)–DUPHOS (BF₄⁻) | (R,R)-Et-DUPHOS-Rh(COD)BF₄ | 228121-39-9 | ≥98% | BF₄⁻ version useful for anion-effect comparisons (activity/solubility/selectivity) | |
Chiral Rh(I)–DUPHOS (OTf⁻) | (S,S)-Me-DUPHOS-Rh(COD)OTf | 136705-75-4 | ≥98% | Me-DUPHOS platform; used to build steric/electronic gradients in asymmetric hydrogenation | |
Chiral Rh(I)–BPE (BF₄⁻) | (S,S)-Ph-BPE-Rh(COD)BF₄ | 849950-53-4 | ≥98% | BPE family often delivers high ee in asymmetric hydrogenation; suitable for screening acrylic acid/amides and related substrates | |
Chiral Rh(I)–BPE (BF₄⁻) | (S,S)-Me-BPE-Rh(COD)BF₄ | 213343-65-8 | ≥98% | Substituent changes tune sterics/electronics; used to optimize ee and activity | |
Chiral Rh(I)–phospholane | Rh(I)(COD) BF₄ complex of 1,2-bis[(2S,5S)-diethylphospholanyl]benzene | 213343-64-7 | ≥98% | Phospholane ligands often give strong stereocontrol; used for quick library building in asymmetric hydrogenation/addition | |
Pre-formed chiral bisphosphine cationic Rh(I) | (+)-1-Benzyl-[(3R,4R)-bis(diphenylphosphino)]pyrrolidine (1,5-cyclooctadiene)rhodium(I) tetrafluoroborate | 99143-48-3 | ≥98% | Rigid chiral scaffold bisphosphine–Rh(I); used for asymmetric hydrogenation and stereochemical induction studies | |
Chiral Rh(I)–phosphacycle (DuPhos-style) | (−)-1,2-bis((2R,5R)-2,5-diphenylphospholane)ethane (1,5-cyclooctadiene)rhodium(I) tetrafluoroborate | 528565-84-6 | ≥98% | One classic asymmetric hydrogenation platform; suitable for substrate-window screening and ee optimization | |
Chiral Rh(I)–phosphacycle (iPr version) | 1,2-bis((2R,5R)-2,5-diisopropylphospholane)ethane (cyclooctadiene)rhodium(I) tetrafluoroborate | 895541-38-5 | ≥98% | More sterically demanding version; used to adjust/improve ee and activity (substrate matching dependent) | |
Chiral Rh(I) bisphosphine (name truncated as provided) | 1,2-bis[(2R,5R)-2,5-(dimethylphos…)]ethane (cyclooctadiene) rhodium(I) tetrafluoroborate | 305818-67-1 | ≥98% | Chiral bisphosphine–Rh(I) platform for asymmetric hydrogenation/addition screening (name kept as in source) | |
Chiral Rh(I) bisphosphine (OTf⁻) | 1,2-bis[(2R,5R)-2,5-dimethylphosph…]benzene (cyclooctadiene) rhodium(I) triflate | 187682-63-9 | ≥98% | OTf⁻ weakly coordinating; used to build more readily activated chiral Rh(I) systems | |
Chiral Rh(I) bisphosphine (OTf⁻) | 1,2-bis[(2S,5S)-2,5-diethylphospholanyl]benzene (1,5-cyclooctadiene) rhodium(I) triflate | 142184-30-3 | ≥98% | Uses configuration/alkyl differences for ee/rate comparisons and optimization | |
Chiral Rh(I) bisphosphine (BF₄⁻) | 1,2-bis[(2S,5S)-2,5-dimethylphosph…]benzene (cyclooctadiene) rhodium(I) tetrafluoroborate | 205064-10-4 | ≥98% | BF₄⁻ version; convenient for anion-effect controls and process condition optimization | |
Chiral Rh(I) bisphosphine (BF₄⁻) | (−)-1,2-bis((2R,5R)-2,5-dimethylphospholane)benzene (cyclooctadiene)rhodium(I) tetrafluoroborate | 210057-23-1 | ≥95% | Chiral bisphosphine platform; common for benchmarking/optimization in asymmetric hydrogenation | |
Chiral Rh(I) arylphosphine platform | (R,R)-(−)-1,2-bis[(o-methoxyphenyl)(phenyl)phosphino]ethane (1,5-cyclooctadiene)rhodium(I) tetrafluoroborate | 56977-92-5 | ≥95% | Aryl substitution can strongly affect ee; suitable for electronic/steric ligand-effect screening | |
Chiral Rh(I)–NORPHOS | (R,R)-NORPHOS-Rh(COD)BF₄ | 521272-85-5 | ≥97% | NORPHOS chiral bisphosphine–Rh(I) platform; commonly used to build asymmetric hydrogenation systems | |
Chiral Rh(I)–NORPHOS | (S,S)-NORPHOS-Rh(COD)BF₄ | 78355-59-6 | ≥97% | Enantiomer control; used to assess ee and condition sensitivity | |
Chiral Rh(I)–BINAP-type | (S,S)-BINAP-type (o-methoxyphenyl/phenylphosphine) Rh(I)(COD) BF₄ | 71423-54-6 | ≥95% | Classic BINAP-family platform; applicable to asymmetric hydrogenation/addition, convenient for literature benchmarking | |
Chiral Rh(I) [2.2]paracyclophane bisphosphine (R) | (R)-[2.2]paracyclophane (COD)BF₄–Rh(I) | 1038932-67-0 | ≥97% | Rigid scaffold supports stereocontrol; used for high-selectivity asymmetric hydrogenation/addition exploration | |
Chiral Rh(I) phane bisphosphine (R) | (R)-[2.2]paracyclophane (phane) bisphosphine (COD)BF₄–Rh(I) | 619334-93-9 | ≥97% | Rigid “phane” bisphosphine platform; used for high-ee asymmetric hydrogenation/addition screening | |
Chiral Rh(I) paracyclophane bisphosphine (R) | (R)-[2.2]paracyclophane bisphosphine (COD)BF₄–Rh(I) | 849950-56-7 | ≥97% | Rigid paracyclophane framework; useful for optimizing “stereochemical environment → ee response” | |
Chiral Rh(I) phane bisphosphine (S) | (S)-[2.2]paracyclophane phane bisphosphine (COD)BF₄–Rh(I) | 1174218-30-4 | ≥97% | Enantiomer version; used for enantioselectivity comparisons | |
Chiral Rh(I) paracyclophane bisphosphine (S) | (S)-[2.2]paracyclophane bisphosphine (COD)Rh(I) | 200808-73-7 | ≥97% | Same series (S) enantiomer; used for ee/activity comparison and optimization | |
Chiral Rh(I) “bipyridine/bisphosphine” (R) | (R)-Bipyridine/bisphosphine-type (COD)BF₄–Rh(I) | 573718-56-6 | ≥97% | Hybrid-ligand platform; useful for library screening and structure–selectivity relationship studies | |
Chiral Rh(I) “bipyridine/bisphosphine” (S) | (S)-Bipyridine/bisphosphine-type (COD)BF₄–Rh(I) | 1174131-02-2 | ≥97% | Enantiomer control; used for ee/substrate-window optimization | |
Chiral Rh(I) ferrocene bisphosphine (R,R) | 1,1′-Bis((2R,5R)-2,5-diethylphosphino)ferrocene (COD) rhodium(I) tetrafluoroborate | 162412-90-0 | ≥95% | Ferrocene-based chiral platform; widely used for stereocontrol in asymmetric hydrogenation/addition | |
Chiral Rh(I) ferrocene bisphosphine (R,R) | 1,1′-Bis((2R,5R)-2,5-diisopropylphosph… )ferrocene (COD) rhodium(I) tetrafluoroborate | 849773-96-2 | ≥95% | Bulkier version; used to enhance stereocontrol or improve substrate matching | |
Chiral Rh(I) ferrocene bisphosphine (R,R) | 1,1′-Bis((2R,5R)-2,5-dimethylphosphino)ferrocene (COD) rhodium(I) tetrafluoroborate | 854275-87-9 | ≥95% | Less bulky version; useful for steric-gradient building to optimize ee/activity | |
Chiral Rh(I) ferrocene bisphosphine (S,S) | 1,1′-Bis((2S,5S)-2,5-diethylphosphino)ferrocene (COD) rhodium(I) tetrafluoroborate | 290347-88-5 | ≥95% | Enantiomer control; used for ee benchmarking and optimization | |
Chiral Rh(I) ferrocene bisphosphine (S,S) | 1,1′-Bis((2S,5S)-2,5-diisopropylphosph… )ferrocene (COD) rhodium(I) tetrafluoroborate | 854920-94-8 | ≥95% | Bulkier enantiomer; used for optimization and controls | |
Chiral Rh(I) ferrocene bisphosphine (S,S) | 1,1′-Bis((2S,5S)-2,5-dimethylphosphino)ferrocene (COD) rhodium(I) tetrafluoroborate | 854920-90-4 | ≥95% | Less bulky enantiomer; used to build steric gradients | |
Chiral Rh(I) bisphosphine (BF₄⁻) | 1,2-bis((2R,5R)-2,5-diethylphosphino)ethane (COD) rhodium(I) tetrafluoroborate | 136705-70-9 | ≥95% | Chiral bisphosphine–Rh(I) platform for asymmetric hydrogenation substrate screening and ee optimization | |
Chiral Rh(I) bisphosphine (BF₄⁻) | 1,2-bis((2R,5R)-2,5-diisopropylphosph… )ethane (COD) rhodium(I) tetrafluoroborate | 136705-72-1 | ≥95% | Version differing in sterics/electronics; used to tune ee/activity and substrate fit | |
Chiral Rh(I) bisphosphine (BF₄⁻) | 1,2-bis((2S,5S)-2,5-diisopropylphosph… )ethane (COD) rhodium(I) tetrafluoroborate | 213343-67-0 | ≥95% | Enantiomer version; used for controls and optimization | |
Commercial pre-formed chiral Rh(I) (catASium®) | catASium® MNN(R)Rh(COD)BF₄ | 908128-78-9 | ≥95% | “Plug-and-play” pre-formed system; suitable for rapid feasibility checks in asymmetric hydrogenation/addition | |
Chiral Rh complex (BOX/related) | Bis(acetato)[(S,S)-4,6-bis(4-isopropyl-2-oxazolin-2-yl)-m-xylene]rhodium | 929896-28-6 | — | Chiral oxazoline-ligand Rh platform; used for screening in asymmetric addition/cyclization (reaction-dependent) | |
Chiral Rh(I) bisphosphine–diene platform | (S,S)-1,2-bis[(tert-butyl)methylphosphino]ethane [η-(2,5-bicycloheptadiene)] rhodium(I) tetrafluoroborate | 203000-59-3 | — | Chiral bisphosphine + diene cationic Rh(I) platform; used to explore ligand effects in asymmetric hydrogenation/addition |
Table D | Rh(II) Dirhodium (Achiral): General Systems for Carbene Transfer/Insertion
Category | Aladdin Cat. No. | Product name | CAS No. | Spec./Purity | Key features / typical uses |
Rh(II) dirhodium carboxylate (OAc) | Dirhodium(II) tetraacetate | 15956-28-2 | Rh 43.0%–46.6% | Classic dirhodium carbene-transfer catalyst; widely used for cyclopropanation, C–H insertion, X–H insertion, etc. | |
Rh(II) dirhodium carboxylate (TFA) | Dirhodium(II) tetratrifluoroacetate | 31126-95-1 | Rh 27.5–35.0% | More electron-withdrawing variant; often used for higher activity or altered selectivity in carbene transfer | |
Rh(II) dirhodium carboxylate (octanoate) | Dirhodium(II) octanoate | 73482-96-9 | Rh ≥25.0% | More hydrophobic and often more soluble in organic media; suitable for carbene transfer in organic-solvent systems | |
Rh(II) dirhodium carboxylate (pivalate) | Dirhodium(II) pivalate (dimer) | 62728-88-5 | ≥99.9% metals basis | Bulkier carboxylate; often used to tune selectivity in carbene transfer reactions | |
Rh(II) dirhodium carboxylate (TPA) | Dirhodium(II) tetrakis(triphenylacetate) (Rh₂(TPA)₄) | 142214-04-8 | ≥99% | Aromatic bulky carboxylate; used to modulate selectivity and substrate matching in carbene transfer | |
Rh(II) dirhodium perfluorocarboxylate | Dirhodium(II) heptafluorobutyrate (dimer) | 73755-28-9 | ≥97% | Strongly electron-withdrawing perfluorocarboxylate; used to explore more reactive/strongly driven carbene-transfer systems | |
Rh(II) dirhodium aromatic carboxylate | Tetrakis(triphenylacetato)dirhodium | 68803-79-2 | ≥97% | Aromatic bulky carboxylate; used for selectivity optimization and mechanistic comparisons in carbene transfer | |
Rh(II) dirhodium (lactam ligand) | Dirhodium(II) tetracaprolactamate | 138984-26-6 | ≥95% | Classic Rh₂(caprolactamate)₄; often used for robust, reproducible carbene transfer | |
Dinuclear Rh carboxylate complex | Bis[(α,α,α′,α′-tetramethyl-1,3-benzenedipropionate)rhodium] | 819050-89-0 | ≥96% (HPLC) | Dinuclear carboxylate platform; used for reactivity/selectivity benchmarking and exploratory catalysis studies |
Table E | Chiral Rh(II) Dirhodium: Asymmetric Carbene Transfer (Cyclopropanation / C–H & X–H Insertion, etc.)
Category | Aladdin Cat. No. | Product name | CAS No. | Spec./Purity | Key features / typical uses |
Chiral Rh(II) dirhodium (amino-acid-derived) | Tetrakis[N-tetrafluorophthalimido-(R)-tert-leucinate]dirhodium, bis(ethyl acetate) adduct | — | ≥98% (HPLC) | Common in asymmetric carbene transfer; used for enantioselective cyclopropanation and insertion reactions | |
Chiral Rh(II) dirhodium (amino-acid-derived) | Same as above (S-tert-leucine) adduct | — | ≥98% (HPLC) | Enantiomer control; used for ee optimization and substrate matching | |
Chiral Rh(II) dirhodium (halogenated aroyl tuning) | Tetrakis[N-tetrachlorophthalimido-(R)-tert-leucinate]dirhodium adduct | 2001054-66-4 | ≥98% (HPLC) | Halogenated aroyl group tunes electronics/sterics; used for selectivity optimization in asymmetric carbene transfer | |
Chiral Rh(II) dirhodium (homologous control) | Same as above (R-tert-leucine) adduct | — | ≥98% | Chiral dirhodium platform; used for benchmarking and scale-up verification in asymmetric carbene transfer | |
Chiral Rh(II) dirhodium (S series) | Tetrakis[N-tetrafluorophthalimido-(S)-tert-leucinate]dirhodium adduct | 564450-56-2 | ≥98% | S-configuration platform; used for enantioselectivity comparisons and ee optimization | |
Chiral Rh(II) dirhodium (S series) | Same as above (S-tert-leucine) adduct | 515876-71-8 | ≥98% | S-series chiral dirhodium; suitable for building “enantiomer–conditions–selectivity” comparison matrices | |
Chiral Rh(II) dirhodium (tetrachloroaroyl, S) | Tetrakis[N-tetrachlorophthalimido-(S)-tert-leucinate]dirhodium adduct | — | ≥95% (HPLC) | Adds an electronics/sterics gradient; used for optimizing asymmetric carbene transfer | |
Chiral Rh(II) dirhodium (Phe-derived) | Tetrakis[N-phthalimido-(S)-phenylalaninate]dirhodium, ethyl acetate adduct | 131219-55-1 | — | Amino-acid-derived chiral dirhodium; used for screening asymmetric carbene transfer reactions | |
Chiral Rh(II) dirhodium (DOSP series) | Rh₂(R-DOSP)₄ | 178879-60-2 | ≥95% | Widely used in asymmetric carbene transfer; for high-ee cyclopropanation/insertion | |
Chiral Rh(II) dirhodium (BTPCP series) | [Rh₂(R-BTPCP)₄] | 1345974-62-0 | ≥95% | BTPCP family; suitable when seeking stronger stereocontrol in carbene transfer | |
Chiral Rh(II) dirhodium (PTAD series) | [Rh₂(R-PTAD)₄] | 909393-65-3 | ≥95% | PTAD family; used for enantioselective cyclopropanation and C–H insertion | |
Chiral Rh(II) dirhodium (BTPCP, specific ligand form) | Tetrakis[[S]-(+)-[(1S)-1-(4-bromophenyl)-2,2-diphenylcyclopropanecarboxylate]]dirhodium(II) [Rh₂(S-BTPCP)₄] | 1345974-63-1 | ≥95% | Specific BTPCP variant; for fine-tuning selectivity and substrate scope | |
Chiral Rh(II) dirhodium (PTAD, specific ligand form) | Tetrakis[[S]-(+)-(1-adamantyl)-(N-phthalimido)acetate]]dirhodium(II) [Rh₂(S-PTAD)₄] | 909389-99-7 | ≥95% | Specific PTAD variant; used to fine-tune enantioselectivity and activity | |
Chiral Rh(II) dirhodium (DOSP, specific ligand form) | Tetrakis[[S]-(−)-N-(p-dodecylphenylsulfonyl)prolinate]dirhodium(II) Rh₂(S-DOSP)₄ | 179162-34-6 | ≥95% | Specific DOSP variant; long-chain substitution may affect solubility/microenvironment and thus selectivity |
Table F | Cp*/C–H Activation and Cyclometalated Rh Platforms
Category | Aladdin Cat. No. | Product name | CAS No. | Spec./Purity | Key features / typical uses |
Cp*Rh(III)Cl₂ dimer precursor | Dichloro(pentamethylcyclopentadienyl)rhodium(III) dimer | 12354-85-7 | ≥99.95% metals basis | Cp*Rh(III) C–H activation “workhorse”; used for directed C–H activation/cyclization/coupling, etc. | |
Cp*Rh(III) halide-free cationic precursor | T282840 | Tris(acetonitrile)(pentamethylcyclopentadienyl)rhodium(III) hexafluoroantimonate | 125357-42-8 | ≥98% | Halide-free with weakly coordinating anion; used for “cleaner” Cp*Rh(III) activation and mechanistic benchmarking |
Substituted Cp–Rh(III)Cl₂ dimer | [1,3-Bis(ethoxycarbonyl)-2,4,5-trimethylcyclopentadien-1-yl]rhodium(III) dichloride dimer | 1352745-18-6 | ≥95% (T) | Cp substitution tunes electronics/sterics; used to modulate reactivity and selectivity in C–H activation systems | |
Cp*Rh(I)(CO)₂ precursor | Dicarbonyl(pentamethylcyclopentadienyl)rhodium(I) | 32627-01-3 | ≥99% | Cp*Rh platform interconversion precursor; suitable for organometallic/mechanistic and ligand-exchange studies | |
Cyclometalated Rh(III) dimer (C^N) | Chloro-bis(2-phenylpyridine)rhodium(III) dimer | 33915-80-9 | ≥98% | Typical C^N cyclometalated Rh(III) platform; used for cyclometalated complex studies/materials and related catalytic exploration |
Table G | Clusters / CO Clusters and Hydride Clusters (Mechanistic Models / Cluster Precursors)
Category | Aladdin Cat. No. | Product name | CAS No. | Spec./Purity | Key features / typical uses |
Rh carbonyl cluster (Rh₆) | Hexarhodium hexadecacarbonyl (Rh₆(CO)₁₆) | 28407-51-4 | Rh 57–60% | Representative carbonyl cluster; used as a cluster/nano-Rh precursor and for CO coordination and mechanistic studies | |
Rh carbonyl cluster (Rh₄) | Tetrarhodium dodecacarbonyl (Rh₄(CO)₁₂) | 19584-30-6 | ≥98% | Classic Rh₄(CO)₁₂; used in carbonyl cluster chemistry, mechanistic models, and precursor exploration | |
Rh hydride cluster (Rh₄–H) | Tetrakis(1,5-cyclooctadiene) tetra-μ-hydrido tetrarhodium | 82660-97-7 | ≥98% | Hydride-cluster model; used for hydrogen transfer/hydrogenation mechanism studies and exploratory reaction platforms |
Aladdin: https://www.aladdinsci.com/
